Do you agree or disagree technology has made children life less creative than in the past. support your answer with reasons and examples.
I would agree with the given statement that technology has made children less creative that they were in the past. Creativity is very important to express the ideas which are in anyone's mind. Technology has restricted the capability of childrens' creativity. I would like to give few examples for the same.
Firstly, Now a days every child has his/her own mobile phone/tablet or laptop to access various information available on the internet. They can easily search for the content they wish to learn and they are readily available from numerous sources in different manners. For example, If a child is asked to write an essay on any topic, he/she can simply search on the internet and get the required information. They can simply copy this and using various tools available for paraphrasing they can get an essay which looks like it is written by him/her. The answer to any question is avalable with a few clicks on mobile. This was not the case earlier. I remember when i was in school, for homework we have to go through various books to find the answer. At last we need to write the answer in our own words so that it should not look like it is copied from the book. This excersie helped me to learn how to write uniquely every time. This way the children in the past developed more thinking capability compared to the current children.
Second, The avaialbility of video games and various entertainment devices made children to be more inclied to stay at home. In their spare times, the children are passing their time by playing video games or watching cartoons or other shows on the TV. When I was a child I used to pass my time by reading story books, painting, playing games and visiting various museums, zoos, aquarium etc. When we go outside we can learn new things and every experience teachs an important lesson for a lifetime. When I visited a new place, i used to remember the place by either painting the memorable moment or by writing something in my diary about the trip. Easy avalability of resources made children too lazy to go outside and have the real sence of feeling. They are more intrested in their phones than doing creative work like painting or learning music. Now a days children are more intrested in clicking pictures and uploading them on social media. These draws them away from appriciating the beauty and capture them in the mind.
So, It can be concluded that the exessive use of technology made the children away from the creative thinking and work. Readiliy avalable contents on the internet and use of video games make the children introvert and restrict their creativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
... few examples for the same. Firstly, Now a days every child has his/her own mobile phon...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... examples for the same. Firstly, Now a days every child has his/her own mobile phon...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s not the case earlier. I remember when i was in school, for homework we have to ...
^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...a lifetime. When I visited a new place, i used to remember the place by either pa...
^
Line 5, column 850, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...e work like painting or learning music. Now a days children are more intrested in clicking...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75219298246 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52041430436 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7767184735 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.68 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.24 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.96 5.45110844103 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163089847915 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051575222747 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077234282931 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129888924751 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786269035819 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.