The debate on whether technology is advancing or suppresing creativity in children has been going on for decades. Some people argue that technology is essential for accomplishing any task in today's world. It might be true because without technology, it would take a lifetime to travel to far away places, impossible to make long distance communications and the list keeps growing. However, in my opinion, I agree with the statement that the creativity among children is diminishing because of technology usage. I feel this way because technology corrodes a child's brain, it increases the child's dependency on them and hinders even basic thinking ability leave alone imagination.
First of all, technology corrodes a child's brain and makes the mind less sharp. While this is true especially in the case of children, it cannot be overlooked in adults either. To illustrate, let us look at the example of the prevailing children attitude these days. They are introduced to smart devices very early in life that they keep staring at it for the whole day. When I was young, my mother used to read books, sing rhymes and play with me to keep me entertained. However, children these days depend on their smart devices for all of these or more. They lose their thinking ability unknowingly as they are too involved in the device.
As a result of corroded brain and diminished thinking ability, children become more dependent on technology to do their quotidian tasks. For instance, my neighbor's son was given a smart phone everyday for viewing educational videos in the youtube application. Consequently, he stopped focussing in the class during school hours. This was because he became complacent that he could learn anything at the time he wants to at home using a smart phone. In this circumstance, what would happen if my neighbors stopped giving him the smart phone? He would definitely deteriorate in his grades.
In other similar situations, this would eventually hinder the basic thinking capacity of children. To consider one case, children would depend on technology such as calculator for performing basic arithmetic calculations. I would like to recall an instance in my past where I went to a restaurant for dinner and the cashier was a young adult. He used the calculator to calculate a basic sum that would not even take seconds to compute in mind. Therefore, it is evident that technology does hinder even the basic thinking capacity.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the statement that children are becoming less creative due to the over usage of technology. Technology corrodes a child's brain, increases dependency and eventually deteriorates the basic thinking ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...y neighbors son was given a smart phone everyday for viewing educational videos in the y...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2258.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13181818182 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86990295571 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538636363636 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9363848771 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.32 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.24 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170106581078 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522234364015 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547491839094 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103552290434 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385860502537 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.