Do you agree or disagree: The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character.
Definitely, the society consists of numerous individuals with diversified personalities. And it is because the individualism that makes it extremely difficult for us to learn about others completely. When referring to how to know more about one another, people have been always raised controversy about the means. The vast majority of people believe that the dressing styles of people can literally reveal their traits. However, I definitely disagree this statement since the way people dress actually depends on many other factors.
Admittedly, some people may concern that the type of people’s clothes can betray their characters. When people choose their clothes, their preference as well as traits will be subconsciously reflected. For instance, people who always wear casually, such as wearing t-shirts, jeans and sneakers are more likely to be outgoing and easy-going due to their carelessness of appearance. Conversely, people who are in formal and delicate suits all the time may be the same rigid in their daily life since they may take everything seriously, including the clothes. Therefore, the aforementioned reasons can account for why some people believe that people’s dressing style can be on behalf of their personalities to some extent.
However, I oppose their statement due to the fact that we should take other key factors into consideration when evaluating some one else. In most cases, the clothes people wear are not the ones they actually like. For instance, a considerable number of enterprises make rules about the types of clothing of their staff, such as requiring them to wear uniforms. Because it can help display favorable images to the public. In other word, the uniforms will exhibit their overall qualities, including the high working efficiency and reliability, to the masses. In this case, it is difficult for us to learn about others through their clothing due to the striking similarities of everyone’s dressing.
What’s more, in most cases, people may take advantage of certain types of clothing to conceal the drawbacks of their body, thus it is inaccurate for us to gain information about their real personalities from their daily dressing. For example, some people who are a little bit fat may dress in black frequently, even though they have preference in white clothes. Also, they may often wear long dresses, but it is not ascertained that they love this kind of clothes. Instead, it is entirely probable that they just make use of these dresses to disguise the fact that they have put on weight recently. Hence, we can never ensure that we get the exact information of one’s characters merely from her clothing.
In sum, although some people may consider observing one’s dressing style as an effective way to view her personalities, I believe that it is abrupt to evaluate one’s traits merely through her clothing in absence of several key factors.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 66
- While scientists have been seriously observing animal behavior for well over a hundred years, the study of why animals play has only recently become a serious research topic. At least three different theories have been advanced to explain the phenomenon.T 80
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person, while some people think that it is a good quality for a person. Which do you prefer? 73
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 66
- 1. Many birds engage in anting, a behavior in which a bird approaches a colony of ants (small insects), picks up ants with its beak, and rubs the ants on its feathers. Since ants instinctively defend themselves by spraying formic acid, the bird ends up wi 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
... to know more about one another, people have been always raised controversy about the means. The...
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: ANY_BODY
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
...tors into consideration when evaluating some one else. In most cases, the clothes people...
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uch as requiring them to wear uniforms. Because it can help display favorable images to...
Line 13, column 271, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ing. For example, some people who are a little bit fat may dress in black frequently, even...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, conversely, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, as well as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2481.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28997867804 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90108932241 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505330490405 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8664685483 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.772727273 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3181818182 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127386580432 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433689541572 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456829277979 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887205497896 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420600450823 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.