do you agree or disagrees with the following statement?
Has the easiness of cooking improved life. Give examples and reasons to support your opinion.
Recent technological advances have changed the way people live radically. People do not have enough time to prepare their own food in a traditional way. So there has been no shortage of debate about how to make food quickly. However, the question is does the readily available food improve people quality of life. Some people believe definitely it improve because of everything available readily with all essential nutritional values. On the other hand, I personally feel it never improve people quality of life for reasons I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the easier preparation of food does not come without a price. If we need to prepare food efficiently, we need to spend money to buy the equipment. Sometimes it is not worth it to buy because we will not use that very often. My uncle Alex is the best example to illustrate this. when he was working at Wipro company, he doesn't have enough time to prepare food so he decided to buy a Roti maker instead of taking restaurant food. He spends almost five thousand on the machine but he used hardly few monthes because no one can take the same food regularly.
In addition to that, the most important loss we suffer due to these fast food is quality. these fast foods are frozen and it contains less nutritional values and lack of minerals and vitamins. Further, they have high calories that result in weight gain and turn leads to cardiac and other health problems. I explain my personal experience as an example to expained this. when I was studying high school at Omak public, I used to take a lot of potato chips and other oily fast foods at the roadside, as a result, i gain huge weight with high cholesterol levels. the doctor suggested stopping taking restaurant food, once i discontinued that food eventually I lose my weight and cholesterol levels become normal. I couldn't imagine my appearance if I still continue that food.
In conclusion, although all these fast foods and preserved foods are unavoidable in today's budy world, we must not negate traditional fresh foods. fast food costs more and unhelth; which leads sever health problems. so, I prefer to take traditional food to improve life rather fast foods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e enough time to prepare their own food in a traditional way. So there has been no shortage of debat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improves'?
Suggestion: improves
...life. Some people believe definitely it improve because of everything available readily...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...is the best example to illustrate this. when he was working at Wipro company, he doe...
^^^^
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hen he was working at Wipro company, he doesnt have enough time to prepare food so he ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'used'.
Suggestion: hardly used
...ost five thousand on the machine but he used hardly few monthes because no one can take the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ffer due to these fast food is quality. these fast foods are frozen and it contains l...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...erience as an example to expained this. when I was studying high school at Omak publ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ast foods at the roadside, as a result, i gain huge weight with high cholesterol ...
^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ge weight with high cholesterol levels. the doctor suggested stopping taking restau...
^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...d stopping taking restaurant food, once i discontinued that food eventually I los...
^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...and cholesterol levels become normal. I couldnt imagine my appearance if I still contin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pearance if I still continue that food. In conclusion, although all these fast f...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fast
...ust not negate traditional fresh foods. fast food costs more and unhelth; which lead...
^^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...lth; which leads sever health problems. so, I prefer to take traditional food to i...
^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...food to improve life rather fast foods.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79210526316 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56699027232 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560526315789 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1567035095 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7727272727 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 5.5376344086 271% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0707840184587 0.236089414692 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264325830014 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387158395274 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0481484221031 0.150856017488 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411704850334 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.