Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.
Friends have an important influence on people’s life. They can make a pleasure time and unforgettable memories for us. In addition, the learning and the way we learn new things is really significant. However, I do not agree that people easily learn from their friends who beside them. Here you can see my reasons.
First of all, people do not have a time. Nowadays, people have to start working early in the morning and continue their work until late at night. In fact by population growing, they need to make more money for cloths, foods etc. Because of that they do not have any time to be with their friends. So, it is clear that if they do not have any close relationship with their friends, they do not have this opportunity to learn from them.
Second, modern technology in another noticeable reason. The new inventions such as computer, smart phone or television and the internet change people’s attitude toward the friends. In fact, nowadays people prefer to learn and get the useful information and knowledge from these equipment’s which are really comfortable and persuasive. Also, these new tools are more trustful than the friends, because their information up to date every second. Hence, it is more helpful than the friends to assist people to learn comfortably and keep the pace with modern technologies and new discoveries.
On the other hand, some people think that the friends have a positive effects on people to learn without difficulty. For example, in a group study students have a communication with each other. They can use from other members’ thinking, idea, and lecture note. It helps them to reach to profound understanding toward the topics and materials in the class. Besides, it improves their performance in the class. However, I do not agree with this claim, because it is not necessary for students to be with their friends and learn from them. There are a lot of educational books and video which help them to learn more effortlessly.
In conclusion, the lack of time, modern technology and useful educational books and videos can be consider the reasons that why the people do not learn from their friends more easily in comparison with the other things.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, however, if, really, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95698924731 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74458547887 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7000794658 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1739130435 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1739130435 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.60869565217 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285436750951 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893632790298 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101744000767 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188406450366 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729853282147 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.