During our careers, we work with many different kinds of people. All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits. In your opinion, which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker?
- A serious attitude regarding their work obligations
- A willingness to learn new things
- The ability to make other people laugh
Work, as we all know, for the majority of people, is a crucial part of the individuals’ life. Due to the paramount importance of job on people, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of experts. In this regard, many believe that co-workers have a remarkable influence on each other. So, it is important to have a colleague who is eager to learn new things. Similarly, I believe that this characteristic provides both employees and companies with numerous advantages. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that the willingness for learning is a significant personality in the workplace is related to company survival. Undoubtedly, for many organizations, it is crucial to surviving in the market. Indeed, to fulfill this aim, a company requires to elaborate, change, or even re-invent ways of introducing its product. Creative staffs play a crucial role in this game. Improved creativity through learning helps the organization to consider this feature a property, especially in hard situations. Their mindfulness, creative solutions, and ingenious problem solving make the situation better for the company, especially in hard situations. A few numbers of evidence show that companies-through taking psychological entrance tests- show more intention to hire creative employees, although critics may challenge this debate and suggest that these tests are not related to the creativity of staff and hold to fit each person with an appropriate position. Needless to say, individuals who try to learn can gain a higher position in knowledge in comparison with their colleagues and can lead them as well. Generally speaking, they act as an engine for the organization. Also, their method for solving issues put the company forward compare to the competitors and help it to stay in the competition.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is a prosperous workplace as a consequence of collaboration. Without a doubt, when one of the employees tries to learn, it motives others to try to improve themselves. Indeed, the competition which rules the relationships in the workplace can be affected by such characteristics. Staffs try to work better and keep pace in gaining knowledge. In other words, they do not want to fall behind their co-workers. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, I worked for a company. One of the employees not only was a genius but also worked hard and always tried to learn. The result was tremendously surprising. I was witnessed how much other employees try to be up to date. The overall result was a flourished workplace. The more knowledge seeker organization has, the more efficient it enjoys. What would have happened if there had not existed such personality in the company? The incentive for improvement would die out quickly.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that the willingness for learning new things provide both employees and companies with a better and higher situation either in the workplace or in the market place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'survive'?
Suggestion: survive
...or many organizations, it is crucial to surviving in the market. Indeed, to fulfill this ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'elaborating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: elaborating
...to fulfill this aim, a company requires to elaborate, change, or even re-invent ways of intr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the workplace or in the market place.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, similarly, so, well, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2659.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2342519685 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1428291999 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553149606299 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.5553516864 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7741935484 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3870967742 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.45110844103 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131223904741 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320724261833 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324731333983 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085347773173 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438653149529 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.