The people we work with have many different characteristics and all of them affect the quality of our time at work. Of the following, what do you think is the most important quality for a boss or supervisor to have?
Supervisors, as we all know, for the majority of people, play a pivotal role in humans’ life. Due to the paramount importance of bosses, efforts for elevating their effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of researchers. In this regard, many believe that the characteristic of a supervisor has remarkable effects on the quality of the time at work. Similarly, I believe that there are numerous traits that can be influential in work circumstances. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that the bosses’ features have effects on employees’ workplace is related to the ability of a boss to show companionship that can arise the workers emotionally and positively provide a company with better moods for workers. Undoubtedly, employees need to feel belong. Apparently, one of the most critical options is transferring this feeling through emotional bonds, and showing accompaniment. One feels better when understands a higher rank person in the company takes them into account. Although many critics may challenge this idea and debate that the top rank of a company should prove their power and act as a real boss, an increasing number of shreds of evidence through confirming that in the successful organizations better relationship has existed, show otherwise. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, I was hired in an organization. The boss’s behavior was fantastic. Not only did he greet everybody every morning, but also he spent some time in the launch table among employees. Many workers liked his personality and accepted themselves as one member of a group. Neither did the boss nor the employees feel an up to down view in the company. Surprisingly, the relationships among employees-during he was the chairman-was remarkable. The significant reason that led the workers to have this feeling was supervisor behavior.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is rewarding that gives workers a goal to work enthusiastically, and also it can raise the loyalty of workers. Without a doubt, when a company hires a person expects that worker to has a loyal attitude toward the organization. In other words, the bosses want in every vicissitude to feel safe from employees’ support. Needless to say, a reasonable practice is rewarding. Indeed, when workers have been rewarded, they think they are essential, and their supervisor observes them. Moreover, they understand that they are one of the critical members of the company. Scientifically speaking, a number of scientists subscribe to the view that the feeling of appreciation conveys favorable signals to workers and attaches them strictly to the system. Employees, on the other hand, show their loyalty to their supervisors. What would happen if the supervisors ignored the feeling of belonging? Obviously, the workers would dispatch easily, and this situation endangers the survival of the company.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that both the feeling of companionship and appreciation can be considered as principal traits of a boss that influence the quality of the time in which spend at work.
- Advertisements for children should not be allowed 86
- What do you feel is the best way to solve when you face difficult problems in life 73
- Technology reduces the amount of creativity in children 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The job has a greater effect on one s overall happiness than social life does 77
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and the distribution of wealth by region Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ity of the time in which spend at work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, thus, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2734.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2984496124 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14605744118 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531007751938 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.7790354984 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.275862069 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7931034483 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55172413793 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214337234187 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483008421952 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645282020234 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150900998042 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672325461384 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 86.8835125448 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.