What do you feel is the best way to solve when you face difficult problems in life?
Problems, as we all know, are inseparable parts of human beings’ life. Due to the paramount importance of problems in humans’ life, efforts for reducing their effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of experts. In this regard, many try to find a practical solution for when one faces difficult problems. In my opinion, the best ways are consulting and making the mind free. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that consulting is a critical way of solving issues is related to humans’ nature. To illustrate, people are born with an instinct to live in a community, believe that most of the problems could be solved with the help of coterie. Although many critics may challenge this idea and debate that a person should tackle their problem without help, an increasing number of shreds of evidence shows otherwise. On the other hand, based on a common belief, “the collective mind is more than the collection of single minds,” so a person can find the best solution among their relationships and communities’ minds. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, I was in high school, and I had a big problem with math, and it had continued for several years, so that it became a difficult one. I remember the time I consulted with one of my close friends. She proposed a group she knew. Surprisingly, just a notification from my friend led me to the right path to solve the big problem. What would have happened if I had never told her the problem? Needless to say, perhaps I would have it for more years.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is helping the mind to ease the problem from very beginning stages. Without a doubt, one of the aspects of any problem had rooted in mind. In other words, the difficulty of an issue directly depends on a person’s mind organization. If a person is an easy-going one, the difficulty of the problem seems less. The stricter mind a person has, the more difficulty one feels. Scientifically speaking, people have two ways of dealing with issues as a whole. One either put the problem in the mind process and routinely think about it or set the brain free from any further thinking, and let the time solve it. Neither the first one nor the second is favorable. Based on psychologists, people who try to have a kind of balance between these two moods are successful. In other meaning, experts provide people with the best solution. Indeed, the best way to solve time-consuming and difficult problems is the combination of the mind and the body. In fact, individuals who try to know the problem, and let the mind do its process without any pressure then focus on activities like exercising to reduce the pressure of overthinking have the best solution. Thus, one should reduce overthinking, especially while solving difficult issues to help the mind to be free to solve it in the best way.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that both the consulting and the helping the mind are practical ways in facing difficult problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun try seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tries'.
Suggestion: many tries
... priorities of experts. In this regard, many try to find a practical solution for when o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, then, thus, while, in fact, kind of, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2605.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80627306273 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78334288041 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 802.8 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5406375875 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8333333333 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76666666667 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210938560114 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549556364234 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558284422657 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132206450312 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215630808742 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.