During times of economic crisis, which area of spending do you think the government should reduce: education, healthcare or support for the unemployed?
Which area of spending should be cut during times of economic crisis is a highly debated topic among people. From my observation of life, I contend that government should reduce the spending of healthcare and re-allocate it to something more urgent.
To begin with, healthcare expense accounts for a great amount of government budget in many countries, but sometimes it is a waste. To illustrate, the healthcare budget should be used to take care of patients who are in need, but many people waste the resources by hospital shopping, which is a behavior meaning that patients visit many different clinics for the same disease. They receive the medicine every doctor gives them but don’t take the medicine until they find a doctor they like. As a result, they go to different doctors and collect many medicines using the budget of government, but eventually they threw the medicine into trash can. Consequently, government should cut the budget of healthcare and use it more efficiently during times of economic crisis.
In the second place, government care about children, and education and the support for the unemployed are important for many children when economic crisis happens. To be more specific, well-educated children can help country thrive in the future by creating innovative idea and then earning money for the country. That is, government should keep emphasize the education. Also, the support for the unemployed is important for many families who do not have income. Unemployed parents would use the money to buy food for their children and maintain their living. As a result, government should reduce the budget of education and the support for the unemployed.
While maintaining health is important and it costs money, so many people think the budget should not be cut. However, my point still stands because there are other ways to maintain health and they do not cost money. For example, people can do exercise and eat healthy to improve their health. Also there is free and abundant information on the Internet teaching people to obtain good hobbits to be healthy, such as, making our bedroom cleaner so we can avoid getting sick due to bacteria. Therefore, even though the government reduces the budget of healthcare, people can still maintain their health.
In summary, government can reduce the budget of healthcare during the economic crisis, since some people waste that resource, and government shall re-allocate it and use it more efficiently. Further, people can still maintain their health with other resource after the budget is cut.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Which area of spending should be cut during t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... a behavior meaning that patients visit many different clinics for the same disease. They rece...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nd eat healthy to improve their health. Also there is free and abundant information ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in summary, such as, as a result, to begin with, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17224880383 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64753751848 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49043062201 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9216347601 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312510561772 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106910563962 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903692643304 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178453426637 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832921379217 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.