TPO46
Both the passage and the lecture discuss the benefit of using electronic medical record. The author suggests three benefits regarding replacing paper-based record, whereas the professor strongly disagrees with the author. She provides three counterclaims accordingly.
To begin with, the reading brings up the point that the cost can be reduced because electronic medical record does not take space to store, and because it is easier for doctor to access, transfer, and duplicate the record. However, the professor refutes this point by arguing that the cost will not be reduced significantly. She further explains that event thought doctors use electronic records they still keep paper-based copy for legal reason, such as to keep the signature, or as an emergency back-up.
In the second place, the scholar does not agree that the electronic medical record could reduce the human error. To be more specific, doctors still record and write in hand during the clinic. It is other staffs enter those records into the electronic system later for the doctors. As a result, it is possible the mistakes happen as in the past.
Last but not least, the author suggests that the electronic data would aid value to research. Yet, the professor seriously challenges this argument and points out that the data are protected by the strict privacy law, so doctors cannot use them easily. For instance, patients have the right to block the usage of their personal data, and doctors must get permission from patient to access the data. However, the process of acquiring permission is long and complex. In consequence, the third reason is not plausible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, third, whereas, as to, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1992481203 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55854895649 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601503759398 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.868531115 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500107986561 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138001357152 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119858436698 0.0662205650399 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277594375239 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849340431542 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.