The effective leader makes an effort to let others feel that he or she has been part of a decision.
In a modernized world, leaders always face the dilemma to supervise employees. Certainly, some people if asked would agree with the statement that leader should make the decision by his of her own, while others would mention that the question depends on a great deal of factors; As far as I concerned, I adopt a firm position that a great leader always let his subordinates to be part of a decision, particularly if leader operate a company.
First of all, it is important to consider how to produce a friendly environment. Certainly, some people may think that a work place should be stay seriously. However, in most cases show that a friendly environment allows employees willing to show their best at work. To illustrate that idea let’s consider the following example. When I was 25 years old, I was invited in a company as a software engineer. And my leader who is always scolding employees for unintentional fault. This in turn became a stressful environment and cause people to be not willing to work with him. As you can see produce a friendly environment, which it can benefit the company.
Equally important is good ideas are stimulated. Definitely, for some leaders in some situation, too many ideas always reach a dead end. However, it is fair to say that for most leaders it will be a effective way to find the solution. Take a case of Nick’s job, a friend of mine whom I have known for 10 years. He is a leader in the team, and he always faces different kinds of problem. In the beginning, he always find the solution by himself, but it take a lot of time to tackle problems. Finally, he accept the ideas from his members, and he realize that the solution comes out more quickly. This experience taught him that going in alone is not a feasible strategy to face a problem.
By way of conclusion, based on the argument explored above, I am of the opinion that in most cases show that two hands are better than one. Solving a problem as a team not only more effective but also more motivative. That is why every leaders should let all the members participate of making decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'staid', 'stayed'?
Suggestion: staid; stayed
...e may think that a work place should be stay seriously. However, in most cases show ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
..., which it can benefit the company. Equally important is good ideas are stimulated....
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 197, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...to say that for most leaders it will be a effective way to find the solution. Tak...
^
Line 6, column 420, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...of problem. In the beginning, he always find the solution by himself, but it take a ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 457, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...ys find the solution by himself, but it take a lot of time to tackle problems. Final...
^^^^
Line 6, column 508, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'accepts'.
Suggestion: accepts
...of time to tackle problems. Finally, he accept the ideas from his members, and he real...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 550, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'realizes'.
Suggestion: realizes
...cept the ideas from his members, and he realize that the solution comes out more quickl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, while, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6550802139 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72305561555 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.5585557198 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9047619048 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8095238095 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189034109954 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475924968831 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629388588331 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116513658734 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057189755291 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.