TPO41
The reading passage explores the issues of handling and storing coal ash, and several reasons are offered in support of this argument. However, the lecturer casts doubt on it and contradicts it for the following reasons.
First of all, even though the reading passage suggests that environmental regulations already exist, the lecturer argues that liner is not effective. This is because new island and drinking water are damaged, which means the chemical object are sustained. Obviously. the lecturer's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
Secondly, the statement held by the writer claims that discourage the recycling of coal ash into other products. Nonetheless, it is argued in the listening that mercury are storing and recycling. The lecturer gives the truth that it is been 15 years and nothing happen.
Last but not least, the lecturer acutely identifies the weakness in the reading passage that costs of disposal and handling. The lecturer convincingly points out that extra cost will be 15 billion; moreover, in order to establish a solid and concrete statement, she offers the example that even though 15 billion seems a lot, but it only cost company avenue 1 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...emical object are sustained. Obviously. the lecturers argument disproves its counte...
^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...al object are sustained. Obviously. the lecturers argument disproves its counterpart in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27083333333 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68256976714 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3972671309 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2069910853 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730133966713 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703272077758 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124234704559 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054043940638 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.