Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Views differ considerably when it comes the issues of a type of career would lead to a successful future. Certainly, some people if asked would agree the statement that it is difficult to have a secure future in the earlier world, while others would mention that that question depends on a great deal of factors. As soon as I concerned, I adopt a firm position that in the past it was easier to identify what type of career would lead to a secure future.
First of all, it is important to consider that it is more simple life in the past. Certainly, some people think that simple life does not mean anything. However, in most cases show that simple life can be more focus on thing people do. I can remember my grandfather, who has a simple life and he is very diligent person. This in turn he has successful career. As you can see simple life in the past can make people have a successful life.
Secondly, the equal importance is that it is more social life in the future. Of course, some people in some situation, the social life in the modern world are diversity. However, it will be fair to say that for most people it will be a obstacle. Take a case of CJ, a friend whom I have known for 10 years. He had a lot of social life, and it caused his career down , because he can not stay focus on his job . This experience taught him that less social life is better his career.
Finally, in the past be a doctor is difficult. I will be first admit that being a doctor is difficult to achieve in the past. By way of example, I can remember my neighbor were a doctor in the past, because he is a very hard working. I think that this is a case for many people as well. In fact, I believe that to have a successful life, you need to be work hard.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that in most cases it is easier to identify what type of work would lead to a successful life in the past. Not only will gain benefits , but also have a secure life. That is why everyone should be grateful what they have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... This in turn he has successful career. As you can see simple life in the past can...
^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... to say that for most people it will be a obstacle. Take a case of CJ, a friend w...
^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cial life, and it caused his career down , because he can not stay focus on his jo...
^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...because he can not stay focus on his job . This experience taught him that less so...
^^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in the past. Not only will gain benefits , but also have a secure life. That is wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in fact, of course, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.21573604061 4.8611393121 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33623096368 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434010152284 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.240533882 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.2173913043 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1304347826 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69565217391 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187170085667 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604864562457 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800624035535 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125771396115 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100091855748 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.9 10.9000537634 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.64 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.