TPO46
The reading explores the issue of electronic databases of patients' medical records, and several reasons are offered in support of this argument. However, the lecturer casts doubt on it and contradicts it for the following reasons.
First of all, even though the reading passage suggests that using electronic records can help reduce costs by saving money, the lecturer argues that it is absurd to think of it. This is because paper records use for backup, which means in the emergency situation it will need it. Obviously the lecturer's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
Secondly, the statement held by the writer claims that electronic can reducing the medical errors. Nonetheless, it is argued in the listening that using electronic records will make a lot of errors.The lecturer give the truth that doctors take the note while examine patient and hand over the detail to office staff, but office staff can not misunderstand the meaning on the paper, so it will cause errors.
Last but not least, the lecturer acutely identifies the weakness in the reading passage that electronic records aiding research. The lecturer convincingly points out that information of patient cannot use for research, because the strict law progress;moreover, in order to establish a solid and concrete statement, he offers the example that patient can block their medical records if they do not want to share.
In conclusion, based on the evidence presented above, it can be clearly seen that the stance on the both sides are paradoxical. Although the contents in the reading passage seem to be plausible, further scrutiny leads to the lecturer believe that the points of view in the reading passage are not correct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ituation it will need it. Obviously the lecturers argument disproves its counterpart in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ronic records will make a lot of errors.The lecturer give the truth that doctors ta...
^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
... will make a lot of errors.The lecturer give the truth that doctors take the note wh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18996415771 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72259442336 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5210095345 49.2860985944 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.636363636 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36255206993 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130789030584 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869487074339 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192602240023 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895697151385 0.0443174109184 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.