TPO48
The reading passage explores the issue of frog extinctions, and several reasons are offered in support of this argument. However, the lecturer casts doubt on it and contradicts it for the following reasons.
First of all, even though the reading passage suggests that frogs are being harmed be pesticides, the lecturer argues that by restrict the pesticide use will cause the price of crops rise. This is because crops need pesticides to protect them from insects, which means use fewer pesticides will cause crops production. Obviously, the lecturer’s argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
In the second place, the statement held by the writer claims that frog population decline is a fungus that has spread around the world. Nonetheless, it is argued in the listening that the treatments need to use by each frog and can not use by large scale. The lecturer gives the truth that even use the treatment on each frog, the treatment can not pass by their offsprings.
Last but not least, the lecturer acutely identifies the weakness in the reading passage that the major factor is not the human activites.
The lecturer convincingly points out that global warming is the major factor that causes frog population declined; moreover, in order to establish a solid and concrete statement, he offers the example that even stop human activities, the global warming still cause frogs in danger.
In conclusion, based on the evidence presented above, it can be clearly seen that the stances on both sides are paradoxical.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, still, in conclusion, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1593625498 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69282040353 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553784860558 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5520599812 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.727272727 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327036600693 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11695394203 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841681593192 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135614825842 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104917043742 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.