The statement contends that today's extended family - grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles - are less important than they were in the past. Although, some may disagree, a thorough analysis of the statement from all angles has led me to believe in the opposite. According to me, the extended family is more or equally and not less important in today's time than it was in the past.
Due to the advancement of technology and social media, we are now more close to our extended family than we ever have been before. Earlier, communication was limited by the speed of transporting letters and a visit to relatives living in another city or perhaphs, another country, required extensive and uncomfortable travel by ships. But the introduction of telephones and video chats coupled its ubiquitous nature has allowed us to connect to people living on any part of the planet in a matter of seconds. Also, with the advancements in travel like faster airplanes, railways, etc, the travel time which was earlier calculated in weeks or months has now reduced to a matter of hours. One can travel from one point on the planet to a diametrically opposite point in a day's time. This has made us more closer to our extended family, contrary to the statement's claim.
The importance of our extended family members have not decreased than its past value. Each and every family member plays an important role in our lives. For instance, grandparents still recall their past tales and entertain us with their humour. They are also vital in teaching us society's culture and moral definitions. Cousins help us during our difficult times. They provide us with moral support and courage that is required from a family member, which cannot be provided by our friends. Aunts and uncles, as I fondly recall have bought me material gifts that I always pined for. Similary, each and every family member in today's world, irrespective of thier closeness have an important role in our lives. Thus, it is rather presumptuous to conclude that the importance of extended family mebers have decreased.
Although, some who disagree, argue that today's urban families are becoming more and more separate and no longer like to live together unlike the past. This has caused family members to grow apart and independent of each other which has reduced their importance in our lives. However, the proponents of this argument fail to take into account the ratio of such urban families' ratio to all the families. If we take a look at the current statistics we'll realize that families have not grown apart, rather come together more than ever before.
In conclusion, the statement's claim that the importance of extended family memebers have decreased and not increased is unsupported. A close analysis reveals the opposite. The importance of extended family had increased or remained equal and not decreased than it was in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... has led me to believe in the opposite. According to me, the extended family is more or equally...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
... point in a days time. This has made us more closer to our extended family, contrary to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'families'' or 'family's'?
Suggestion: families'; family's
...ke into account the ratio of such urban families ratio to all the families. If we take a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2417.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00414078675 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66741017729 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488612836439 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 777.6 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4438083441 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.68 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.32 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43217617237 0.236089414692 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127359572962 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153088933249 0.0737576698707 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268477679395 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122598138834 0.0645574589148 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.