The statement contends that it is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new ones. Although, some may disagree, a thorough analysis of the statement from all angles leads me to believe that keeping your old friends is equally important to make new friends. A person cannot grow without making new connections while nourishing the old ones.
Keeping your old friends is very important. Old friends have stayed with you for a long time and provided support to you during your hard times. Thus, it is very important to acknowledge their support and nourish such relations. For instance, I recall the time I was going through a hard time financially. My friend, however, provided me with food and supplies by the time I was financially stable again. I not only repayed every penny but this also helped us make our friendship more deeper and meaningful. I would never forget his contribution and support. Thus, it is very important to keep your old friends.
Making new friends is equally important because by making new friends, a person learns new values, culture and knowledge. This helps in a faster and better growth of an individual, because it provides the individual with a better outside perspective which is necessary for overall development. For example, people travel to different places to study or in search of work. They are alien to the place's functioning and culture. Hence, making new friends helps you become familiar with your surroundings and live better lives.
Although, some who disagree argue that it is more important to show loyalty to one's old friends than make new ones. The old friends have been with you for so long and deserve a person's loyalty. However, the proponents of the argument fail to recognize and hence, correct their inherent assumption. They are blindly assuming that making new friends respresents disloyalty to one's old friends. Had you not made new friends you wouldn't have become friends with your current group of friends. Their argument is contradictory and cannot be accepted as a valid reason.
In conclusion, the statement wrongly posits that keeping your old friends is more important than making new ones. Making new friends is required for an individual's growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'deeper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: deeper
...this also helped us make our friendship more deeper and meaningful. I would never forget hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... surroundings and live better lives. Although, some who disagree argue that it is mor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...been with you for so long and deserve a persons loyalty. However, the proponents of the...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...iends. Had you not made new friends you wouldnt have become friends with your current g...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
.... Making new friends is required for an individuals growth.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02412868633 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64264299859 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479892761394 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1681508725 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0833333333 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5416666667 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.630737196031 0.236089414692 267% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200976037297 0.076458572812 263% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202329679156 0.0737576698707 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.435384505689 0.150856017488 289% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149306718378 0.0645574589148 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.