Some argue that the extended family is more valuable at present. They cite to the point that large family helps to transfer experiences from the older to the young ones more easily than the smaller family. However, I disagree with those people and believe that the extended family is less important at present because of two main reasons which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
Smaller family is easier to eliminate conflicts. There will be less disagreements as there will be less persons with the opinions, and eventually, leading to the well managed family. My personal experience is the perfect example of it. In the past, when I was a kid, we had extended family; there was always minor conflicts among the family members. We had to face difficulty to make decisions and were unable to make decisions on our own; we had to organize the meetings to buy new items needed which used to require a lot of time. My grandfather was the one who used to make the major decisions. If I needed something, then the decision had to be passed from my father to the grandfather and whole family which was frustrating. The process required almost a day to weeks and even months. But now, we have small family, and decision making takes less than a day and there are very less conflicts of the opinions. Thus, the large family is less required at present days.
Moreover, it is easier for the smaller family to travel and spend happy life. In present world, we have to move from place to place for the job opportunities. The smaller family is easier to manage on such scenarios. For example, For a structural engineers who move from place to place during his jobs and projects, it is easier to move. The family can easily move and it is also easier to take the reponsibility of the small family unlike the large family. The members of the family can always remain in touch of each other and this will finally lead to the more happier family. Therefore, when it comes to happiness and management, small family should be everyone's priority.
For the aforementioned reasons, I strongly believe that extended family is almost of no use in the present generation. The small family leads to less conflicts, and consequently, happy life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun disagreements is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...r to eliminate conflicts. There will be less disagreements as there will be less per...
^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun persons is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... be less disagreements as there will be less persons with the opinions, and eventual...
^^^^
Line 3, column 883, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun conflicts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...akes less than a day and there are very less conflicts of the opinions. Thus, the la...
^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'engineer'?
Suggestion: engineer
...cenarios. For example, For a structural engineers who move from place to place during his...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
...other and this will finally lead to the more happier family. Therefore, when it comes to hap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun conflicts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...t generation. The small family leads to less conflicts, and consequently, happy life...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74358974359 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58785917732 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474358974359 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4117908271 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0909090909 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328247447252 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091307868076 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724378947916 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194641382602 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685975634576 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.