Fiction or non fiction
By large and beyond, it is beyond doubt that learning is integral for children to be successful. In this regard, getting knowledge from reading informative books is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars whether parents should let their kids study fiction or nonfiction data. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea of agreeing on parent's choice for forcing their kids to read non-fiction books rather than fiction stories. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my opinion is that children learn and improve their personalities by reading non-fiction books. Since these kinds of books contain the successful biography of famous and genius personalities, it really impacts children's thinking. It is notable that by getting impressed by such real-life heroes, kids urge themselves to work hard and innovative like them at an early stage of life. Moreover, non-imaginary books provide the depth of knowledge about practical concepts and scientific approaches. Therefore, they literally build a profound mind and character which is good for kids. By way of illustration, last week my son was reading the book "Life of Muhammad", a biography of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). He got really impressed by the just personality that he promised me about he will never lie to anyone ever again. Not only that, but he also decided to do charity a little money every month. I think that non-fiction books put a huge impact on him and brought out the inner soft corner of his personality. Now he prefers to read non-fiction books and as a parent, I love that about him.
The second rationale behind my viewpoint is rooted in the fact that fiction books are imaginary and could cause depression in people. Nowadays, 6 out of 10 people are suffering from depression which is a feeling of being sad and lonely. One of the reasons is fiction depicted in books and movies. As most of the stories are imaginary and not realistic with a happy ending, people found them very attractive. But, when they apply those strategies in real life, they get disappointed and resulted in sadness which is not good for their health. As a case in mind, my brother was addicted to reading fiction novels from teenage. Now, he got into a great depression because his married life could not get successful as he always imagined it to be perfect by always reading perfect love stories. But, this is what not happened in real life. As a result, he got depressed and upset. This clearly illustrates the bad effect of fiction on people.
By perusing the above paragraphs, I can infer that although fiction stuff provides amusement to kids, non-fiction is good for them comparatively. For the sake of brevity, a couple of reasons are worth reiterating: first, non-fiction improves children's personality, secondly, fiction causes depression. As a writer, I vehemently urge people to read more practical books and avoid imaginary stories.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... fiction or nonfiction data. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of agr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2549.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0675944334 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8692646218 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55069582505 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7802019061 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0357142857 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9642857143 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60714285714 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353590526435 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106058148426 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137281224555 0.0737576698707 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267729470534 0.150856017488 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105144595514 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.