Fiction (such as short stories or novels) can teach us more about life than textbooks can”. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
People may read many different books during their life. Normally, books can be classified in two groups, reality based textbooks which address the fundamental basic human science and novels and non-realistic texts known as fictional books. Some people think that we should read more textbooks. However, some others suggested that fictional books can help us more and be much beneficial for us. I believe that we should read more fictional books rather than the old huge textbooks and I have some good reasons to prove it.
First, I think people and especially young adults read enough old school thick textbooks every day in high schools and collages without any outcome. Generally they cover mostly a highlighted series of information about any science and they mostly just mentioned the cold facts and argued their proof mathematically or logically. They have not put any glimpse of matter that could stimulate readers’ sense of innovation totally.
Imagination and dreaming are some powers that have been addressed less effectively in textbooks. In this world we need to create new technologies and train skillful and innovative persons since our societies are growing so fast and creative engineers and managers place are empty in our occupation cycle. Fictional books with their ability to turning impossible facts to possible events may open some pathways in their readers' minds to solve a complicated severe problem with the help of these books. For example, flying was a far unreachable dream for human for centuries which children can read about it only in fictional books. But reading these kind of books eventually inspired two engineer brothers for going beyond their fear and try to face an experience that one day seems to be a joke.
Also, fictional books create a context for all people to encourage them about writing. It triggers a joy and enthusiasm in readers that can assist them in their way of being great writers, because text books only show you the achievements of the others without leaving any question mark in their readers’ minds to follow their subject by themselves. Fictional books on the other hand bring a vast crafted world among your sight to observe it and even being part of it.
In conclusion, people spend a lot of their time reading variety of books during school or in universities and at work. These books should coach your creativeness and innovation besides adding something new to your information. Fictional books provide us with more information about a better life. So reading those set of books might be more beneficial than rough boring textbooks.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 50
- Some people say that the best way to raise children is to encourage them to be independent thinkers Others disagree and say that children need to be taught discipline in order to become successful Using specific examples discuss these two opinions State w 83
- summarize the points made in the lecture about Edmontosaurs migration, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the passage about possible reasons for Edmontosaurs migration. 80
- Some people like different friends. Others like similar friends. Compare the advantages of these two? Kinds of friends which kind of friend do you prefer? 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than parents in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
People may read many different books during their life. Normally, book...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minds solving'.
Suggestion: minds solving
...may open some pathways in their readers minds to solve a complicated severe problem with the h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 644, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...it only in fictional books. But reading these kind of books eventually inspired two engine...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minds following'.
Suggestion: minds following
...ny question mark in their readers' minds to follow their subject by themselves. Fictional ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o observe it and even being part of it. In conclusion, people spend a lot of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1261682243 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65043911378 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556074766355 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1738866983 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.7 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177903569147 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605217202633 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656578102981 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102794745337 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541180196686 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.