A government spends money on all adults after 25-year-old on a training course for the most up-to-date skills at workplace. Do you think it is effective？ Why or why not？
Today, with rapid development of the society, the knowledge and skills also update fast, it seems helpful or even necessary for the government to do something useful to give the young people more chances. Nevertheless, training all adults after 25-year-old for the most up-to-date skills is unpractical for following aspects.
First of all, it is difficult for us to define what skill is up-to-date and just meaningful. Today, the society includes many jobs and different jobs usually require different talents or skills. So if we really hold the training, the problem is that who can decide which skill is more important so that everyone needs to take charge of. Moreover, whether it is fair if we only cover the need of one group of jobs also needs our more considerations.
Besides, training usually cost much money, even waste in bad conditions. If we are preparing the training, the first thing is that we should train the teacher who can train others, and this course definitely needs money, a lot of money. It is a burden for the government to offer so much money and continue to maintain other fairs. Moreover, though the money problem can be solved, no one can guarantee that these trainings are just useful for the young. So it takes big risk to invest much but return none.
Finally, the training can also cause burden to someone who does not need or is not willing to learn. For example, my uncle who is 26 years old and he opens a restaurant with his wife, living very happily. Let us imagine what will go on if the policy is done. At that time, one training called 'How to use computer well' happens to him and he must learn. He may have operated his restaurant well, but now he will take the burden from the government, just learning a subject that is difficult for him but he does not need at all! That sounds ridiculous! So the welfare may become the doom when people just do not need!
To sum up, the original purpose of the government is worth praising, but the way conducted needs further serious considerations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, well, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72144846797 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54544895285 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545961002786 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.9548921853 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9375 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241240267345 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815022924544 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101543991066 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137170914851 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098165198061 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.