Some people have ambitious dreams and keep pursuing them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better and why?
People all like dreams, but not all people love goals because they may think that the goals limit them to the grant dreams. Nevertheless, as for me, I prefer the more realistic one.
To begin with, realistic goals can let us get the joy of success more easily. Realistic goals are usually small and feasible for us, so it is highly possible that we achieve the goals if we put our time and efforts into it. In this way, we can obtain the joy of success. However, when we set the grant dreams, we may encounter a number of difficulties in the way to realize it. On account of that, we might not be confident if we usually cannot get over the difficulties well and soon. In the long term, it is hard for us to insist in this condition. So, we may lose our heart and give up eventually.
Besides, more realistic goals usually can gain more support. I believe that everyone has this experience in his school. There are two average students which behave almost in many aspects. One says that he wants to be the president of the school union and the other just competes for the group leader of a team presentation. We might think that the first student is a bit vaunting because he is average in everything. However, for the other, we may find him a modest student which can rely on. Therefore, we might be willing to give him this chance to lead us in such project, and even we might give advice to him.
So, for this topic, I believe that the strong heart can set everything for either goals or dreams.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 280.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37142857143 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35363375161 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4167136717 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113444665408 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375595877193 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521829927611 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863128439115 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735133476415 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.77 10.9000537634 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 86.8835125448 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.