Governments should spend money on internet access than a transportation system.
It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and modern life where we live, the advent of the internet is one of the most significant parts of our social life. In this regard, while some people hold on the view that accessing to high-speed internet should be considered by governments rather than improving the quality of public transportation, others stay at the end of the continuum and assert that the internet has a priority. As far as I am concerned, more money should be allocated in order to improve the internet access compared to solve the transportation issues because not only does the internet give the opportunity to be more knowledgeable, but individuals also can communicate with each other with less cost. In the following, I will elaborate on my reasons.
First and foremost, contributing money on internet issues by governments give the chance to people for being more knowledgeable. For more clarification, there are many sites which let people improve their awareness in many fields whenever they want. As a result, by using it anytime, they can reduce their dead times on the bus or when they are waiting for some appointments. An example can drive this notion home. When a person wants to go to work, especially when he lives in big cities where the distances are too much, he can study or read a magazine on the internet. Accessing to the internet gives him the opportunity to reduce his waste time, and exhibit him from being exhausted of communing. As an illustration, if he wants to study 1 hour a day in order to learn the Spanish language, he will be fluent and adept in it after a year. As a matter of fact, having spent about three hundred hours a year by using online lessons or papers through the internet, he would be knowledgeable in each area he wants.
To mention the last but not the least point, people can communicate with friends and families in a cheaper way regarding the internet. To say that, when people want to call their relatives without net especially when they prefer to talk too many hours, it costs them a lot. However, by using the free calls, besides the video calls which is more interesting, people are able to talks more. In fact, the more they could access the net, the more they would communicate and benefit from the advantages of communication. Take my personal experience as an example. I remember when I was studying my bachelor degree in other cities, and I lived far from my family. At first, my phone did not access the internet, and because of the high price of calling, I spend less time connecting to my family. Besides, I did have no new friends in the new city, and I could not express my feeling and ideas with a person. After a while, I became depresses. So, I decided to buy an internet account, and, as a result, I spoke a lot with my family. By talking to them about either my problems or feeling, I could release my tensions. Had I not access the internet, it could have cost me too much to talk to my relatives.
All in all, by taking all the reasons and examples mentioned previously into account, governments should allocate money to enhance internet access rather than public transportation. As a result, people can be more knowledgeable and educated and communicate cheaper. At last, who can ignore the beneficial impact of the internet on human life?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, while, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2756.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 588.0 407.700716846 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68707482993 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9242980521 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77295801025 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 212.727598566 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494897959184 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 875.7 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2129448643 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.074074074 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81481481481 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223602116578 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054053959713 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740782936628 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161441682502 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797165233353 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.