Summarise the reading and listening
Both lecturer and the passage discuss paying taxes by the cigarette smokers, and similar taxes can be considered for unhealthy foods, too. In this regard, while the lecture states that this policy would be beneficial, the professor casts doubt on it and challenged this point of view. In the following, the contract will be presented.
First of all, the reading mentions that the taxes, required for smokers, would dissuade them to be engaged in unhealthy behaviors, and, consequently, make them refuse it. Furthermore, the people who use unhealthy food would reduce their eating of junk food. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes it and point out that these people would keep on doing their work. For example, smokers will but cheaper and low-quality cigarette instead of using the better one, more harmful, if the taxes rise. Moreover, the people who are attendant to buy junk food, they will have less money to buy a healthy one because of the high price of unhealthy food. As a matter of fact, they would prefer to buy unhealthy food anyway.
Secondly, the lecture says that it is unfair for all people to contribute equal money the same as the people who are sick because of smoking and having an unhealthy style of living. On the contrary, the professor refuses this idea and states that the definition of fairness is different for many people. It would be unfair for smokers who have low income to pay the taxes the same as the smokers with high revenue. In this line of thinking, there is more burden on a person whose revenue is low and wants to eat unhealthy food in order to pay taxes. It is crystal clear that the rich person can pay the taxes as easily as possible comparing to poor ones.
Finally, the passage express that the income of the governments would be elevated in the case of receiving the taxes, and, as a result, they can improve the quality of the public parks and education system. In contrast, in the listening, the lecturer does not think so and asserts that this revenue may have downsides for them. Because the governments would depend on this income and set many laws in order to continue having these taxes. For example, they ban people from smoking in the public and even private situations. In fact, they do not want to lose the revenue and pursue to achieve it from people altogether.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in contrast, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 408.0 270.72406181 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71078431373 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37897666833 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473039215686 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 596.7 419.366225166 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7841221838 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.157894737 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6315789474 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0112392696106 0.272083759551 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00354766888224 0.0996497079465 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0150514843442 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0062329982672 0.162205337803 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107958696823 0.0443174109184 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.