Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage

Essay topics:

Question: Summarise the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

The article and lecture are both about Hydrogen based fuel cell engine.While the author of the readings believes that threre are many advantages of having those cars. The lecturere holds a different opinion.

First, the writer states that hydrogen can be found in varity of sources such as natural gas and water. Furthermore, the article mentions these kind of source are reproduceable. In contrast, the lecturere argues that hydrogen is not easily avilable in the earth. He elaborates on this by saing that it is very difficult. to get H2 in liquid status because it need very cold tempreture (- 200 c) to be form.

Secondly, the author asserts that by using this type of engine no biohazard production. Thus, its safer on our enviornment. However, the speaker refutes this idea and mentiones that If we want to produce a pure hydrogen a process called purfaction must me used. He explain this concept by saying to set a clean hydrogen we need to burn alot of oils at the factories. So, this will increase the poulltion.

Finally,
The passage stated that it is cheaper to use this kind of engine. However, the spaker opposes the idea from the author and mentiones that full cells need a very expansive materiale called pllatinum to opreate full cells. in contrast of what the author thinks

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...h about Hydrogen based fuel cell engine.While the author of the readings believes tha...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h about Hydrogen based fuel cell engine.While the author of the readings believes tha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ater. Furthermore, the article mentions these kind of source are reproduceable. In contras...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...his by saing that it is very difficult. to get H2 in liquid status because it need...
^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ery cold tempreture - 200 c to be form. Secondly, the author asserts that by usi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...cess called purfaction must me used. He explain this concept by saying to set a clean h...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill increase the poulltion. Finally, The passage stated that it is cheaper to...
^^^
Line 8, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...called pllatinum to opreate full cells. in contrast of what the author thinks
^^
Line 8, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...led pllatinum to opreate full cells. in contrast of what the author thinks
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in contrast, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8778280543 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6118824702 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628959276018 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7117782575 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8666666667 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7333333333 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0439245396282 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0125368864093 0.0996497079465 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0184359608853 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0281887422421 0.162205337803 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132098332123 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.