busy parents should have fun playing games and sports. others believe that they should do things together that are related to schoolwork.
Parents should spend sometimes with their children. In this regard, while some people believe that they should have fun with each other, others hold this opinion that parents could help their children when they are doing assignments. As far as I am concerned, it is better for families to spend their time seeing each other while they are helping their children doing homework because not only do children become closer to their mothers and fathers, they also would be more accomplished in their lessons. In the following, I will explore my reasons.
First and foremost, children will intimate to their parents when they spend more time with them. On the other hand, they do not want to share their hobbies with them since they are not in the same age. Consequently, the best way to be closer and spend more time is doing the works related to school which make them more intending to get involved. Take my personal experience as an example. I remember when I was in elementary school. By studying and doing my assignments with my mom, I could trust her speaking about my private issues. Sharing my problems with her let me to feel comfortable with her, so I preferred to tell everything in a result of considering her as my friend. In many cases, she even could help me to deal with most of my challenges in a right order. Had she not spent more time with my homework, I would not have trusted her. On the contrary, my father asked me to spend the time going out and playing volleyball with me, but because I considered him as my father whose age is a lot older than me, I preferred playing sports with my friends, and refuse to be with him. Nowadays, I do not feel comfortable with him like before.
Secondly, students whose parents help them doing their homework get better grades comparing to others. With this keep in our minds, for students who have to study alone, there is no one who could correct their mistakes except their teachers that are too busy to concentrate on one person as much as possible. As a consequence, the more the parents help their children doing their assignments, the more the students will be educated. For instance, if a student is solving the math problems and no one spend time in order to understand his weaknesses very well, not only on that grade but also in the future he will expose to many problems. In fact, he feels unqualified and stupid because of seeing the bad results. In the case that student had a parents who let him to flourish and compensate his mistakes, he could be more confident. Although he may be intelligent enough, he would not feel that so much. As a result, he would choose an inappropriate major which does not align with his real talents.
All in all, parents should spend the times with their children while they are doing work related to their school in order to make them trustful and knowledgeable. There are too many talented students who because of not being recognized by their parents, they choose the improper job and major. Parents could be more reliable and friendly through spending their time with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'spend'.
Suggestion: sometimes spend
Parents should spend sometimes with their children. In this regard, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to do' or 'do'.
Suggestion: to do; do
...ondly, students whose parents help them doing their homework get better grades compar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 744, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a parent' or simply 'parents'?
Suggestion: a parent; parents
...d results. In the case that student had a parents who let him to flourish and compensate ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in fact, speaking about, as a result, in many cases, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 90.0 43.0788530466 209% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2539.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64168190128 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47026912405 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45155393053 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7511170667 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6538461538 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0384615385 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80769230769 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158564742407 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520966451786 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681359314983 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119807289705 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662581805016 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.