Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team).

As the cultural heritage of mankind, arts embody not merely human intelligence and creativity, but also unique traditions. Therefore, in order to pass them down from generation to generation their purity and uniqueness should be well protected. It is the government's responsibility to render financial support to them, especially those with historic value. The same is true with sports. The significance of athletics has gone far beyond the primary purpose of maintaining health and gaining strength. The thriving of a nation's sports symbolizes the overall quality of its people and the comprehensive strength of the country. As a result, both arts and sports should receive the government's support.

To begin with, governmental support helps preserve traditional art forms. Today, many legacies of our ancestors are facing a crisis due to the neglect of younger people. We can find evidence in Chinese painting. Despite its history of thousands of years, young artists tend to show more passion in modern art forms. Many art colleges have even cancelled traditional Chinese painting courses. If financial assistance arrives, some young painters might have the impetus to take up this traditional art form, and then more exhibitions will be held to attract people's attention. Consequently, it might regain popularity among the masses. Once a traditional art form is brought to the limelight, its value may be better recognized by more citizens, and young people begin to cherish the essential qualities encompassed in it and may even begin to give their own support.

Besides, if more funds from the government are created, national arts will have the opportunity to be accepted by the world. Outstanding artists or art groups might be sponsored on many international tours. They will be able to take advantage of these overseas travels to disseminate the essences and values of those arts and make them known to foreign friends. Once a traditional art form obtains renown abroad, its influence is considerably extended. Take Beijing Opera as an instance. If such a national treasure could be shown to other nations, it can become a window for the outside world to understand the uniqueness of Chinese culture and value.

Similarly, state sponsorship in athletics is also beneficial to both the athletes and the nation. With financial support from the government, coaches and players will have better training facilities. Higher income might also improve the athletes' living and health conditions. Besides, a more scientific and advanced sports system can be established to help cultivate potential team members, who are qualified to win gold medals in international events like the Olympic games and bring glory to the country and its people. Hence, the international image of the nation can be remarkably lifted.

Those essential qualities shown in diversified art forms should be recognized by the public. The enhancement of sports teams demands tremendous support from the government. As long as a dynamic and effective state sponsorship system could be built and further developed, both arts and athletics will be acknowledged and supported by all ordinary citizens in the nation.

Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ess should be well protected. It is the governments responsibility to render financial supp...
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aintaining health and gaining strength. The thriving of a nations sports symbolizes...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, if, may, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2697.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36182902584 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92059555293 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540755467197 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7053596383 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3448275862 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93103448276 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209396549753 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512893806978 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478084306038 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119135634607 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201226851418 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.