If food tastes good, it is probably bad for you. How far do you agree with this statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion
I personally agree with the statement that if food tastes good, it is probably bad for me. There are a few reasons why I feel this way.
One of the reasons is that nowadays, food producing compnies make everything to sell their products, whithout thinking of concequences. Modern food, especially the processed one, contains a myriad of artificial flavors. Those flavors are chemicals, which are likely to harm people`s health. For instance, some people experience tremendous problems, such as stomach pain, after consuming different kind of snacks. Moreover, it is the scientifically proved fact that these taisty foods have in their content certain substances, which can cause cancer. If the companies decrease number of the artificial flavors in the products, the food will taste less attractive. Despite people`s desire to eat delicious foods, they have to think what kind of drawbacks it will bring them in the future. To that end, humans should read carefully the content of the food they buy in the grocery stores.
Another reason is that the more beneficial for humans food is tasteless. To be clear, most of the vegetables, which include a variety ov vitamins, so advantaguous for people`s wellbeing, are lack of taste, if cooked without oil or salt. Oil and batter tend to enhance level of bad cholesterol, and lead to heart deseases. High concentration of salt, in tern, is egregious for humans` joints and bones. If people prepare vegatables with a meager amount of oil and salt, they can avoid acquiring heart and joints illness in early age, or elliminate them at all. Despite of oppinion that we live just one life and must to enjoy it from different aspects, people should think about their health in advance. So, in most the cases the less dilicious the food, the most it safe.
To sum it up, I feel that when I eat something really tasty, it is going to be danger for my health. This is because, today`s food ful of harmful chamicals and while cooking, people very often overlook negative consequences of that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...oppinion that we live just one life and must to enjoy it from different aspects, people...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overlook negative consequences of that.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, really, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0029154519 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7925646503 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594752186589 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7550296406 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3157894737 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165608959181 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057791050876 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866911562679 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146991656576 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134652197428 0.0645574589148 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.