If a government is facing economic problems, which one or which ones should the government spend less money on? A. Arts B. Scientific research C. Parks and public gardens
Government, the organization that reallocate the fund scientifically collected through taxation, should always take care of its citizens. If a government is confronted with economic problems, personally speaking, arts should be spent less money on than the scientific research or parks and public gardens.
First and for most scientific research is of top priority in a country’s development. With the support of scientific research from government, the advanced technology may emerge and can be conducive to the development of the country. Take my country China as an illustration, our government sacrificed a great deal inventing and constructing the high-speed railway which is now the fastest railway in the world. As people throughout the world know this, China even bring technology out and help other countries build the railway. Eventually our international statue dramatically goes up, blooming the economy condition. The less money spent on scientific research, the fewer advanced technology results will be obtained by China. Thus China may be outdated around the world without the economy rising. In this way, scientific research is undoubtedly crucial to develop the country which ought to be stand by government financially. If without enough money spend on
What’s more, the parks and public gardens is a good place which enables people to gather together in the parks to communicate and take exercise. Nowadays people are inevitably under different kinds of pressure ranging from school to work. Having access to parks and public gardens enrich the rest time of a day as well as afford a place for people to make friends with others living near the parks. After a whole-day busy work, you come to the park. You feel the breeze from the lake, smell the scent of the flowers, hear the twittering of the birds and see the inviting sunset. What a relief! All the pressure has gone after a few minute stay on the bench near the lake. Everyone can share the places and these will definitely increase the extend of people’s well-being. Nothing is more important than the well-being of their citizens for a country.
Last but not the least, arts can be only a tool of entertainment. Admittedly, some people tend to believe that arts will have obvious merits, one of which is that people can feel relieved when enjoy the arts like movies and pictures. However, if we can view such a situation from a different perspective, we can easily figure out that not all the people are accessible to arts because they cost people money. Even if the people paid for the arts they not necessarily understand the meaning of the arts and may be not satisfied with the arts which as a result is a waste of time and money. Actually as I mentioned before, people can relax in parks and public gardens and they are free to everyone so there is no need to spend much money on arts
In conclusion, arts should be spent less money on than the scientific research or parks and public gardens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...logy results will be obtained by China. Thus China may be outdated around the world ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 938, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to be stand by government financially. If without enough money spend on What&...
^^
Line 3, column 970, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cially. If without enough money spend on What's more, the parks and public g...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 743, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...aces and these will definitely increase the extend of people's well-being. Nothing is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 744, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is no need to spend much money on arts In conclusion, arts should be spent les...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd much money on arts In conclusion, arts should be spent less money on than ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2503.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98605577689 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78082012865 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503984063745 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5866467787 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.826086957 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8260869565 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08695652174 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340016504831 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084918681499 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101494643504 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210438065693 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829052922941 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.