Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers’ salaries.
Nowadays with society progresses, more and more people have access to receive education. And the quality of education is a hot concern. Some people argue that increasing teachers’ salaries is the best way to improve the quality of education. However, personally speaking, I don’t agree with this thought. Increasing teachers’ salaries may be a good way but not the best way. There is still other good ways to improve the quality of education.
To some extent, teachers’ getting higher pay do count in the quality of education since teachers are the people who teach directly various kinds of knowledge to students. Some might hold the opinion that the higher the teacher gets paid, the more dedicated the teacher will be in teaching resulting in the better quality of education. Indeed, it’s not always the same. If the teacher just obtains a higher salary without the improvement of his or her teaching skills or capacity of academic knowledge, no matter how hard you work nothing can be done to benefit the quality of education. So feedbacks from the students are really a must for teachers to improve his or her teaching skills. With years of getting education, students can distinguish whether the teacher is not a good teacher. What’s more, if more expenditure spent on teachers’ salaries, students’ tuition may be affected. Once the tuition increased, some of students may cannot afford to pay for it, which is against the aim of education.
Actually aside from the factor of teachers, a good atmosphere of study plays an important role in improving the quality of education. As for setting a good study atmosphere, what a school can do is to offer more books, build advanced laboratories, and hold some academic speeches. Imagine you study in a school. There is a library full of books where you can find any books you want to read in the libraries. In the advanced laboratory, you are available to the leading edge of your area. From time to time, you even may attend a speech given by a master in your area who you really admire a lot. What a wonderful school full of deep academic atmosphere. I can’t imagine how hard for you to not getting in touch with new knowledge. With a good academic atmosphere, one will get to know it and fund the interesting of learning. In this way there is no doubt quality of education will be easily enhanced.
In conclusion, education now is not only about teachers’ practice of teaching, but also about students’ own study. Teachers could pay attention to the feedback from the students he or she taught and improve his or her teaching skills. Schools are supposed to supply better hardware and software for students to create a good academic atmosphere for students to study in. Therefore the quality of education will getting better and better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 940, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the students') or simply say ''some students''.
Suggestion: some of the students; some students
...e affected. Once the tuition increased, some of students may cannot afford to pay for it, which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ic atmosphere for students to study in. Therefore the quality of education will getting b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...Therefore the quality of education will getting better and better.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, as for, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2378.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97489539749 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86319370431 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466527196653 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.9 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5378484896 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9285714286 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334058838418 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995780561415 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755288322687 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219998381965 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955614824315 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.