The best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers’ salaries.
Education, the foundation of a quality life, has been valued and even triggers a heated discussion over what is the best way to improve the quality of education. Investing more in schools’ facilities, in some people’s views, is the best way to guarantee a quality education. Contrary to these people’s opinion is my perspective that the best way to secure a quality education is increasing teachers’ salaries, due to the contributions to teachers’ job satisfaction and performance.
What must be prioritized is that increasing teachers’ salaries, instead of spending money in other aspects, is beneficial to teachers’ job satisfaction, by providing teachers and their family with a quality life. To begin with, it is higher salaries that provide teachers with the access to a better living standard. In detail, earning more money, teachers can purchase healthier food and something they want, such as clothes, make-ups, and electronic products, which will definitely heighten their living standard; in contrast, will teachers be passionate with their work when they can’t afford to meet the basic needs of life? Moreover, never can we ignore the significance of higher salaries to life satisfaction of teachers’ family. To explain it further, only with higher salaries can teachers afford to satisfy their family, such as enabling their children to attend some additional courses, buying their parents dietary supplements and offering better health care to their family; on the other hand, if teachers can’t get paid much, they might not concentrate well on their works and there will be some distractions, such as parents’ health problems and children’s education difficulties, which will definitely affect the quality of education.
What should be equally worth discussing is that offering a pay rise, which is effortless to achieve, is advantageous to teachers’ performance, by triggering their enthusiasm in teaching and offering them more knowledge and skills. To begin with, never can we ignore the significance of growing salaries to teachers’ impetus to tutoring. Specifically, by receiving higher salaries, teachers will find it more motivating to preparing classes, correcting students’ homework and regulating students’ behaviors; on the other hand, without seeing their incomes take a jump, teachers are likely to have no incentive to focus on their work. Additionally, it is higher pay that provides teachers with the access to a bulk of expertise. To be more specific, with higher wages, teachers can acquire a wide range of knowledge by reading some books or attending classes, shaping their instructional tactics; however, under no circumstances will teachers obtain such a large quantity of knowledge if they don’t get paid enough.
Teachers’ job satisfaction, essential contributors to a quality education, will be improved when teachers get paid more. Teachers’ performance, the foundation of teachers’ future development, will be boosted, if their salaries are raised. To conclude, only when teachers receive higher wages can the quality of education be improved.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in contrast, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2724.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73473684211 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3480065595 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477894736842 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 4.94265232975 344% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.268444217 48.9658058833 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.25 100.406767564 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6875 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370920857748 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162625172033 0.076458572812 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111307941621 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29303379739 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139011193475 0.0645574589148 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 11.7677419355 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.55 10.9000537634 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.