Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
I totally disagree that educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. For one thing, there is no study in any field can guarantee the so-called lucrative career in the future. For another thing, students who are encouraged to choose this field may not enjoy the study in this field. While some people may argue that institutions may earn a sum of donation from their potential successful alumni, this policy may lead to dissatisfaction among their graduates.
To begin with, no such fields of study can guarantee the so-called career in the future. To get a successful career requires a combination of a solid grasp of professional knowledge, a good interpersonal relationship and a personality of perseverance. For example, graduates who majoring in computer science can find a position where they may receive lucrative career in the future. But if they lack essential knowledge, do not know how to communicate with their colleagues and are not meticulous about their assignments, it is easy for them to fail to have a successful career.
Moreover, the field of study which students are encouraged to study may not the interest of the students. Their lack of interes of the field they are stuying in may weaken their motivation to study, rendering them not to work hard. Each piece of knowledge taught to them may be prosaic to them, let alone to understand it. In this case, it can be a problem for them to graduate from the school. If they manage to graduate and find a job in this field, it can be hard for them to obtain job satisfaction. In this way, getting well-paid or earning a lucrative career is of small possible.
Some people may claim that by encouraging students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative career, institutions may get a sum of donation from their potential successful alumni. Therefore, with the money, they can attract more renowned professor and introduce advance teaching facilities to improve their quality of education. In that case, they can more successful and great alumni. This cycle undoubtedly making institutions better and better. Nevertheless, schools overlook a point that this policy may lead to the students’ aversion about this field of study, and finally their aversion about this school. Even though they may be successful in the future, they may not be happy about donating money for the school.
In conclusion, while it is understandable for education institutions to encourage students to learn fields of study preparing them for the lucrative career, it is undesirable to do that because there is no guaranteed lucrative career and some students may not enjoy the field of study.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, another thing, for example, in conclusion, for another thing, for one thing, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06593406593 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89794200532 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421978021978 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9545454111 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.761904762 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286324867594 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109007553372 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125009580843 0.0758088955206 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198307953146 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774138277373 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.