If people want to contribute to society, which of the following is the best way?
• Riding bicycle or walking on foot
• Recycling the waste
• Buy local organic food
In today's modern and sophisticated world, contributing to society plays a vital role in societies' success. In this connection, each person feels responsible for improving different parts of society. Although some people believe that riding a bike can help a country, many other people hold a view that it is beneficial to recycle waste. There is still the third group who concurs with the notion that it is helpful for countries to consume local and organic food. I agree with the second group idea, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, by recycling waste, few extra resources will be needed, which has a positive effect on people's lives. To be more specific, factories use countless natural resources to produce goods; hence, if people do not throw the useless commodities out, it will provide an ideal opportunity to reuse their initial materials to produce the new one. For example, innumerable trees are cut every year to produce papers; however, by recycling papers, there is no need to ruin the environment to create papers. By doing so, the surrounding is saved, and one has a portation in these impressive effects.
Second, recycling waste reduces pollutions in a society, so people need to contribute to this project. To elucidate, because many of the wastes are unbiodegradable, a government should destroy them by either burning them, which is harmful to the air, or burring them, which pollutes the soil. According to my own experience, last week, I went to a rural area to have some fresh air, but there was polluted. Accordingly, many birds died because a government burned wastes there, which produced a tremendous amount of carbon dioxide. Moreover, plants were ruined according to the soil pollution as parts of waste were buried in the place.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that people should contribute to maintaining a society by recycling waste. Not only does waste recycling save natural resources, but it also does not increase pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, third, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14029850746 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77146134649 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623880597015 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9506398375 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220913837521 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648803728666 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532050816657 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124958585966 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368340612601 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.