Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, teachers play a vital role in improving educational systems. In this connection, each teacher is professional in teaching specific subjects. Although contested by many that the matter of having different instructors at schools is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that it can be a plus if young pupils learn all subjects from one teacher, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, if pupils have one instructor who teaches all courses, they will take classes seriously, so it has advantages for them. To be more specific, some lessons are influential, and some of them are unimportant at school. When a minor course is taught by different instructors as a major course, a schoolchild does not pay attention to the teacher who teaches a minor one. Therefore, learners respect only major lessons' tutors, and they cannot comprehend secondary topics as they do not take them severely. For example, my son is n years old, and he has several teachers at school. The teacher that teaches mathematics is different from his painting teacher. As mathematics is an essential topic, he respects his tutors and completes all his assignments wonderfully; however, he does not perform his painting homework. If his mathematics teacher teaches a painting, he will take this course seriously since his math tutor seems severe for him.
Second, when one tutor teaches all subjects, he will become familiar with pupils' abilities in all aspects, thereby informing others about talents. To elucidate, when one teacher monitors a schoolchild in all topics at school, he will notice that each students' negative and positive points; thus, he helps them to achieve success in the courses which they are gifted. According to my own experience, when I was an elementary student, I had one tutor in all fields. Accordingly, he realized that who was skillful in each lesson, and guided each learner based on their abilities; moreover, he helps students to know their interests. He understood that I was talented in sports, so I enrolled in sports school, and I was continuing this skill for many years. As a result, I am an expert in swimming major, and I have won impressive medals. If I had not one teacher, I would not recognize that I was more gifted in sports than other subjects.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that it is helpful for students to have one tutor when they are young. Not only does one teacher induce students to take part in all lessons significantly, but he also has a considerable amount of information about each learner's skills.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...information about each learners skills.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01965065502 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87322390529 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510917030568 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2907798234 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.476190476 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25490565977 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828490176404 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594015983696 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167147332001 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233825556949 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...information about each learners skills.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01965065502 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87322390529 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510917030568 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2907798234 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.476190476 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25490565977 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828490176404 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594015983696 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167147332001 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233825556949 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.