Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decisions quickly; when a leader takes too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as inefficient to the people he leads.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, a wonderful leader plays a vital role in a group's success. In this connection, a successful leader should have many characteristics. Although contested by many that the matter of guiders should allocate a wealth of time to make a decision is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that a thriving leader should decide quickly, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, there are some emergencies in people's lives, so leaders cannot waste too much time to decide about them. To be more specific, some situations need to decide quickly; otherwise, people miss their opportunities. According to my own experience, I went camping with my friends a few months ago, and we designated one of our smart friends as a leader. When we wanted to return to our city, the weather was inclement as it was snowy and cold; moreover, the route was muddy, which made the situation complicated for us. Therefore, we should decide whether we stayed in camps until the weather became suitable or returned to the city. We asked our leader to make the decision, and he should present his idea immediately. While the route was unsuitable, he decided to return home because he did not know when the snow would finish. After we arrive home, we realized that the snow destroyed the route. If he had not decided quickly, we would have got stuck in the snow.
Second, if leaders decide quickly, people will not interfere in asserted opinions. To elucidate, spending too much time on deciding allows other members to express their ideas, which cause conflict among a group. For example, when I was a student, my teacher assigned me to decide about the books which we preferred to study in a class. I could not decide because I wanted to search for many books on the net before expressing my opinion. Therefore, my classmates informed me about the negative and positive points of each book; thus, as they had opposite viewpoints from each other, they had lengthened debate, which weakened their relationship. As a result, leaders should not spend a tremendous amount of time to decide; otherwise, members obey the quick decisions and do not have time to present their ideas.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that it is a great boon for leaders to express their decisions quickly. Not only some circumstances in life are emergency, but also other members do not have time to conflict about their disagreements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...onderful leader plays a vital role in a groups success. In this connection, a successf...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to conflict about their disagreements.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92938496583 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76686716045 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535307517084 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4803179839 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.047619048 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9047619048 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234623345611 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744766412733 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545657339674 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141065780709 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270916716612 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.