You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friend with him or her?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, friendship plays a vital role in people's lives. In this connection, a relationship is not always according to our interests. Although contested by many that the matter of cutting with a friend, who does not behave according to their friends' opinions, is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that people should continue their friendship with one who does something that they do not like, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, people should not expect others to do things that they like because each person has a distinctive personality. To be more specific, if one wants a long-lasting friendship, they should adapt themselves to their friends' ideas. According to my own experience, one of my classmates was my friend for ten years, but one day, she wanted to go to a party, which was not enjoyable for me. She invited me to go with her, but I refused her invitation, so she went there without me. As a result, I felt angry, leading to reducing our relationship. As I became mature enough, I realized that each person has the right to have different interests and attitudes from me, and I was not a reasonable person when I did not continue my relationship with my friend.
Second, friends should talk with each other about their disagreements; thus, they become familiar with each other interests. To elucidate, if people want to maintain their relationship, they will enjoy knowing about their friends' priorities. By discussing their arguments, they can express their emotion and convey the exact reasons for their feelings, which helps solve their problems. For example, I decided to watch a movie with my friend, but she downloaded the movie which I did not like. I told her that we should not watch the film; however, she did not accept my opinion. After a while, when she talked with me about my angry feelings, I told her by watching that movie, I remembered my dead father. Accordingly, she understood my emotions and felt regret; moreover, she has not watched that film again.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that people should not break with their friends when they have conflict. Not only do even two people not think in the same way, but friends also can solve their tensions by speaking on topics rather than cutting with each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s ideas. According to my own experience, one of my classmates was my friend for t...
^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cs rather than cutting with each other.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, as a result, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91904761905 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74775109033 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519047619048 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9611096954 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.736842105 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1052631579 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238490697721 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842553131351 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637422906278 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168157980731 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142427022709 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.