If you are a leader for a group of three to four people, which of the following features are the most important when choosing group members?
-honesty
-the ability to get along well with others
-the ability to communicate clearly
People usually have different views on what is the most crucial for a team leader to choose their team members. In my opinion, I would place emphasis on their communication skills.
First of all, as a leader the most important for me is efficient, and having excellent communication skills can finish the schedule on time or faster. For example, my brother has unbelievable communication skills. To be more specific, he is a project manager, and he usually has to negotiate with his clients. That is, because of his outstanding communication skills, he makes every plan on time, and also his boss gets him promoted in a year. If my brother is honest, he would probably ruin a plan since he does not tell innocent lies.
Secondly, when I am a leader in a group, the most essential thing for selecting my members is having the best solution, and people with good communication abilities can do it. For instance, I am a university student, and usually have some team projects to do. That is, my team members always have extraordinary communication abilities, which can express their ideas and solutions clearly. However, if I select some people who get along well with others, they would tend to say nothing since they do not want to make others unhappy.
Last but not the least, I care about the outcome, and my team members with clear communication abilities can help them to deliver their descriptions and have a good outcome. Take my friend as an example, he is the leader of a student organization. He told me that the most things that he would select to become his members are required to have the best communication skill. To elaborate, his members have many speeches for arguing with their rights, and also presenting students’ thoughts. Therefore, having good communication skills usually provides him to get good results.
In conclusion, from what I have been mentioned above, I strongly propose that the most important thing to select members is having a good communication ability. After all, since I place emphasis on efficiency, solutions, and outcome.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, after all, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95988538682 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8950436366 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492836676218 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7479171456 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1666666667 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245902850513 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790002323737 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685184949135 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140017952669 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649672338149 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.