Teamwork is of importance in the studying period. Some people state that teachers should allocate the project for each student respectively, while others argue that teachers should collaborate with the students to finish the whole project together. As for me, I believe that working with the students to complete all the projects is a better way if I’m a teacher.
First of all, teachers and students can learn from each other when they work on the project. Take me for example, when I cooperated with the elementary school students to work on the art exhibition, I always got plenty of ideas from the students’ paintings. They used their imagination to create a fancy high technology world on the canvases, which inspired me to be more imaginative on the project. Additionally, I also gave them some feedback about their painting skills. Thus, by working on the art project with each other, not only can the students learned how to draw well from my advice but I can also inspire them to think imaginatively.
Secondly, working together on the whole project can be more effective since the teacher can help students more instantly. For example, when my friend, Andy, and I worked on the tough scientific report, our chemistry teacher, Pete, always collaborated with us. Not only could he adjust our experimental direction to a correct way but he also helped us with some difficult data analysis. With Pete’s help, our scientific project was always on the right track and worked smoothly, making it complete in time. Therefore, working with Pete really made Andy and me got big assistance on the difficult project.
Thirdly, if teachers separate and divided the project, it will make a huge conflict between the teacher and students due to the lack of communication. For instance, my friends Rose and Ivy used to work with their math teacher, Tim, on the math calculation project. Because Tim was a busy professor, he divided the project into three parts and allocated them to Rose and Ivy. With a lack of discussion, the project handed by Rose and Ivy did not meet Tim’s expectations, making him furious. Furthermore, Rose and Ivy felt angry as well and they even reported Tim’s ridiculous behavior to the dean, causing a big fight with each of them. Hence, allocating the project to let teachers and students work separately really built a negative relationship among Rose, Ivy, and Tim.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that teacher-student collaboration is the better way if I’m the teacher. Not only can both of us learn from other’s advantages but it can make the project go completed efficiently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01363636364 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80246349716 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506818181818 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2937200357 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.047619048 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9523809524 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2380952381 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258384451453 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905356671146 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556514820509 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157787485922 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438209571091 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.