If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Nowadays, the employers always want their company to develop well. Some people want to hire an experienced worker at a higher salary, but others want to give the job to an inexperienced worker at a lower salary. However, I strongly think that hiring an experienced worker at a higher salary is the better option because I can save money, save more time and make my company flourish.
Firstly, giving work to an experienced worker at a higher salary is preferable because experienced workers may turn a bigger profit in the long run. When you hire that worker, you do not have to teach he or she how to do the work; moreover, you do not have to arrange for their supervision.
Secondly, hiring an experienced worker at a higher salary is the better because I waste less time with training. If you hire an inexperienced worker, you have to teach that worker step by step how to do the job well. It may cost a lot of time to do that, time that could be used on other tasks and on the development of the company.
Finally, I think that an experienced employee at a higher salary is the right choice because it may help my company to develop faster. He or she has experience, which means that the worker can easily get the job done and do it effectively. If you give an important job to an inexperienced worker, the worker might make a lot of mistakes in the job. So you may lose a lot of money and your company may lose its charisma. There will be fewer negatives if you hire an experienced worker, because your company will thrive.
In conclusion, I think that giving work to an experienced worker is the correct one. I believe that it saves my money, it saves time and it will help my company develop faster.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'i think', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.190201729107 0.229887763892 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.167146974063 0.158761421928 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0864553314121 0.0866891130778 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0432276657061 0.046263068375 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0951008645533 0.0685040099705 139% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0951008645533 0.118717715034 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0172910662824 0.0351676179071 49% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.59424717746 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0403458213256 0.0309702414327 130% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.112391930836 0.0887237588012 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0345821325648 0.0209618222197 165% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014409221902 0.0139019557991 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1710.0 2387.08602151 72% => OK
No of words: 315.0 408.028673835 77% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.86048508987 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48200974243 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.298412698413 0.338922669872 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.190476190476 0.251872472559 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.104761904762 0.174417080927 60% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0825396825397 0.112833075102 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59424717746 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 212.727598566 61% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412698412698 0.524397521467 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.1982888198 59.2087087015 68% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7440815164 48.84282405 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 120.699889404 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.644075263715 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 40.0476190476 45.7405998639 88% => OK
Elegance: 0.990566037736 1.45489161554 68% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447940927131 0.300154397459 149% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115035011815 0.103427244359 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0587779466116 0.0752933317313 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.555821441597 0.497263757937 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119558895322 0.151897553556 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200334027904 0.114077575197 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124028733404 0.0781384742642 159% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.402454345945 0.336927656856 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0696414171799 0.067059652881 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309834806743 0.210909579961 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100091740258 0.0618886996521 162% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 60 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.