If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary?

Essay topics:

If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary?

In highly competitive business world, a company needs to take various factors into consideration when deciding to recruit new employees. Many interviewers often face the same dilemma when weighing between seniority and salary. If I were an employer, an experienced applicant is more preferable even though it means I have to offer a higher monthly salary.

First, an experienced worker will be inclined to create more profits for a company. In comparison with workplace newbies whose inexperience may lead to long stretches of adjustment in a new environment, experienced candidates can accommodate themselves to new circumstances in a relatively short term, which will greatly enhance productivity and efficiency. Besides, when tackling tricky problems in workplaces, experienced workers equipped with more professional skills can come up with effective strategies while inexperienced workers face high chances of making serious mistakes due to inexpertness, hesitancy,and timidness, which may cause great financial losses. Therefore, for the sake of a company’s interests, an interviewer should prefer experienced applicants than inexperienced ones.

Second, inexperienced workers can hardly remain loyal to a company for a prolonged time. A recent survey by China Daily Youth reveals that workers without much work experience have much higher possibilities of job-hopping and show a weaker sense of responsibilities especially when they find their work slightly challenging or are offered a higher salary by another company. Of 2,000 respondents, 64.6% of employees averagely change their jobs once a year for such factors as difficulties in getting salary rise or promotion. In order to save human costs, a company should place great emphasis not only in hiring staff with less money but also in maintaining employee retention. In contrast, experienced workers give priority to stable work. When dissatisfied with their incomes, poor working environments, and overtime work, they feel more open to express their dissatisfaction instead of quitting their jobs. To guarantee retention of staff, a company should recruit experienced candidates.

Last but not least, experienced workers are more proficient in interpersonal skills, which will further contribute to a comfortable working atmosphere. Employees must know how to develop great relationships with their colleagues so that they can cooperate with each other more effectively. Inexperienced staff who usually lack a sense of belonging in a new working environment often find themselves hard to integrate with the new community. Consequently, the estranged relationship with colleagues will in turn exert negative impacts on not only their own work but also their colleagues’. Experienced workers have already learned how to fulfill a common objective more efficiently by working closely with their colleagues. In other words, experienced workers creates a more enjoyable working atmosphere.

In conclusion, experienced workers are more favorable in workplaces in that they are more efficient, reliable and enjoyable.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...o create more profits for a company. In comparison with workplace newbies whose inexperien...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
... mistakes due to inexpertness, hesitancy,and timidness, which may cause great financ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2645.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82599118943 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30368941584 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588105726872 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 815.4 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5501400584 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.952380952 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224483120674 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768572224677 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705805946321 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131214820852 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401618494488 0.0645574589148 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 10.9000537634 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.