Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa
Giving speech in public and presenting in front of others poses one of the most stressful situation which one could experinces in all over his/her life. Since, it is somehow natural for speakers to have some mistakes or saying something incorrect. In this event, some attempt to interrupt the presentation by noticing mistakes or giving their comments; while others keep away themeselve to say anything at all. There are a third group that wait until meeting finished and then express their opinion speaker privately. I personally agree with the last people and elaborate on my viewpoint as following pharagraphes.
First, in many cultures and contexts this is an impolite and non-professional behaviour to cut the speaker’s words. Beside taking the designed time of the presentation, the reason is that giving your opposing approach or idea during the meeting could add up to the lecturer stress and made him nervous. What’s more, the immediate response to any mistakes might distract his and other audince’s concentration from the remaining of the topic.
Second, it is possible that one has not recognized that this is a wrong issue and a type of misunderstanding occurred for him. This point certainly misleads the viewers- for example students- and could affect on his further decision making or planes. Take this as an example that this wrong information was being related to a date, a number or a theory. Mentioned person might take some action wrong or very late that could not compensate anymore.
In sume, as beforementoned ground, interrupting a presentation is a rude and distracting maaner and could misguide the audinces about a concept or data. Therefore, I strongy disagree with two first suggestion and prefer to do an action after meeting without presence of any one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
... say anything at all. There are a third group that wait until meeting finished and th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...iewers- for example students- and could affect on his further decision making or planes. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...ction after meeting without presence of any one.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 292.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18493150685 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97751472206 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63698630137 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6398115709 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10204728669 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340987593223 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380231430031 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576596080834 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499770871884 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.