Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
For years, there are so many behaviours and abilities in any meetings including job interviews, studying in the classrooms, etc in the world. All these behaviours have different impacts on these situations, and some of them more effective than the others. And, which one is the best it depend's whatever, however they are used.
First of all, a goal whose people have to some targets is important, and people who want to achieve these targets should be listen carefully and calmly for reaching them. And, these targets sometimes interviews which doing by a big company or a factory. Then, if the person who is candidate doing bad behaviour there would be a failure which affect that company's boss or manager negatively. For that reason, these people would not get that job.
Also, let's think an education and its places where people interact each other. Almost all these areas have their rules which manage by teachers or communities. And, there would be different ways for teaching students. For example discussing, that is the way for improvement of student's mental and physiological abilities, but it is implemented surely and quietly. In these approaches there would be respect which followed by students to each other, in contrast their productivities and that ways effectivities could be bad, students could not be graduate their schools.
In addition, in some political competitions and elections, there would be more arguments and debates between candidates. Although, they usually faced with the other, they sometimes would be on the T.V. to affect their supporters. In that situations, there would dishonesty, these candidates may speak loudly, they would be not respectful to other candidates.
Moreover, an interruption is often the bad behaviour, in some countries being calm and respect toward a leader is a good behaviour like ritual and a religional aspect. All these countries, people who behave the other especially to their leader, always charged, and they occasionally sent to a jail.
In conclusion, taking account of all above reasons and examples, which ways or methods are the best, it depend's how they used. For that reason, if I have to prefer one of these ways, that would be sometimes interrupting, sometimes waiting with doing nothing, or saying nothing
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
For years, there are so many behaviours and ...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'listened'?
Suggestion: listened
...want to achieve these targets should be listen carefully and calmly for reaching them....
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ehaviour there would be a failure which affect that companys boss or manager negatively. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough, they usually faced with the other, they sometimes would be on the T.V. to a...
^^
Line 13, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be not respectful to other candidates. Moreover, an interruption is often the b...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 189, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put between 'would' and 'be'.
Suggestion: would sometimes be
... have to prefer one of these ways, that would be sometimes interrupting, sometimes waiting with do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23513513514 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7881113044 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9044565302 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.947368421 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4736842105 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0746734294423 0.236089414692 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273275047867 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278888716777 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0461092634869 0.150856017488 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260267785769 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.