Some people prefer to inform lecturers' mistakes during the class right away. In my view, It is far better to tell the teacher these matters after the class. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, interrupting the class causes the teacher to lose his focus. When someone teaches a concept, asking him or especially telling him his mistakes ceases the teaching process. This destroys his concentration. For example, last week, I had a physics class. The class was at 9 AM. Also, I should go to my professor office to ask him about my major project's topic after that class. The class started just on time and, the instructor taught very well, but some students were frequently telling some non-important mistakes, for example, spelling mistakes, etc. As a result, the professor couldn't focus enough to finish the class on time and, he held us half an hour more than usual. So, I lost my meeting. Moreover, since my professor left the university for a one-month tour, I had a serious problem in conducting my project. This experiment shows that mentioning the teacher's mistakes during his class negatively affects his focus.
Secondly, implying the teacher's mistakes in front of the crowd destroys his spirit and reputation. It is far better to tell lecturer's major mistakes in private so, he can correct them in the next season. My own experience demonstrates this concept. last year, I was taking a biology class which had a TA class. My friend was the teacher of that class. One day, during his teaching, he made a terrible mistake. Immediately, one of the students mentioned his error and, caused all the class to laugh at him. This happening caused him to lose half of his class attendance, who though now he didn't even know the basics of the course. If that student had told him his problem in private, my friend wouldn't have lost his image in the class.
In conclusion, I strongly believe telling teachers their mistakes in private is more preferable because that retains their focus on the subject and because that preserves the instructor's reputation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 593, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...stakes, etc. As a result, the professor couldnt focus enough to finish the class on tim...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...n experience demonstrates this concept. last year, I was taking a biology class whic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...his class attendance, who though now he didnt even know the basics of the course. If ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 693, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...d him his problem in private, my friend wouldnt have lost his image in the class. In c...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructors'' or 'instructor's'?
Suggestion: instructors'; instructor's
... subject and because that preserves the instructors reputation.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8347107438 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60535578912 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534435261708 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1856457634 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.125 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.125 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129765006268 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461464366989 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365274296486 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926000350979 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391827122281 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.