Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is or do anything
It is usual in meetings or classrooms that we hear somethings that seem false. Each person can have a unique reaction: you can say at that moment, wait till the ending or say nothing at all. In my view, most of the time, the best way is politely saying your opinion. There is a lot of reason for this behavior, which two of them, which are great importance, elaborated hereunder.
First of all, this reaction at first it seems that interrupt the other audience's attention, but it can be really helpful. If you understand it correctly and the speaker makes wrong, it will cause misunderstanding for the other participants. By saying nothing, they will learn or judge it completely wrong, and it will harm the aim of the meeting or class. In fact, you help the lecturer and help the whole to get the point of the meeting correctly. For instance, my father had an important meeting with a company to link those two companies together. He worked really hard, and he was really tired. In the middle of the meeting, he presented a fact completely wrong about the financial. One of his colleagues corrected his word and saved the company.
Moreover, sometimes you just get the point wrong, and in this situation, you're not the only one who misunderstands the point. If you don't talk about the point on your mind, you will get the whole lecture or conversations wrong, and in the end, your conclusion will not lead you to the point that is the purpose of that class or meeting. For example, I remember that I had a chemistry class, and the teacher talked about the atoms and their structures. My imagination of the structure was completely different at that moment. I did not say anything and lost the whole lecture about it. At the final exam, I face many problems.
To sum up, I strongly believe that it is really better to say your opinion in the middle of the gathering and help to get the meeting's purpose. If your view is right, you can help the lecturer correct his mistake, and If you wrong, you and the other audience will correct the confusion about the point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'audiences'' or 'audience's'?
Suggestion: audiences'; audience's
...first it seems that interrupt the other audiences attention, but it can be really helpful...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wrongs'?
Suggestion: wrongs
... they will learn or judge it completely wrong, and it will harm the aim of the meetin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...the point wrong, and in this situation, youre not the only one who misunderstands the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ne who misunderstands the point. If you dont talk about the point on your mind, you ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, really, so, for example, for instance, in fact, first of all, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56873315364 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5780145871 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498652291105 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2848571335 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.75 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.55 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257512988864 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728168686138 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561119521869 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172723754668 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049384264772 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.