TOPIC # 49 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, e-mail, or telephone calls.
Human beings are social animal and one of his crucial needs is companion with the other people. We make friend to grow and enjoy the life that we have. There is an argument whether new friends make you feel happiness or old friends. some people think that ability of making new friendship is better, but in my view, keeping old friends are the best capabilities. Two main reasons of this viewpoint are elaborated in following paragraphs.
First, when you have a small group of friends around you for a long time and maintain them, you become comfortable with each other and in hardships you can rely on your freinds with no doubt, and know that they will be behind you in any situation. In other words, your close friends are the most reliable people that you know, and these trusts come from the years that you spend together. For instance, if one of my close friends wants to borrow money, I will give it to her as soon as possible. In this case, I know her very well and know that she really needs this money and do not want to deceive me.
Second, with your close friends you have more fun and you are convinient around them. When you spend many years with someone, you have more in common with her. As a result, you can spend your free time on activities that both of you enjoy. I have a friend, who really likes to read variety of books, and we start reading a book together and analyze it, after we finish it. It is an activity that we really enjoy plus enhance our cognitive ability. In contrast, with your new friends you should waste a lot of time to find a subject that both of you like it, and also need more time to learn how to talk about it in order to use the benefits of this.
To sum up, I strongly believe old friends bring more happiness in life. They are more reliable and trustworthy, and you can have much more fun with them.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO 30 3
- TPO 41 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 34 Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia It was described in 1741 by Georg W Steller a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 70
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...make you feel happiness or old friends. some people think that ability of making ne...
^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some people think that ability of making new friendship is better, but in my view...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, well, for instance, in contrast, no doubt, you know, as a result, in my view, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3275862069 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15472792351 2.67179642975 81% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531609195402 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0041308901 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5882352941 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119488850155 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437262714221 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383168444678 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746455425602 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258653969399 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 58.1214874552 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.