Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Face to Face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters e mail or telephone calls Use specific reasons and details to support your answer
In a world where there are plethora of unanswered questions, It is critically important that our ideas and opinions are made known to others. Personally, I believe that in order to adequately disseminate information, coming facially in contact with the receiver would be most effective. There are two reasons why I feel this way which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, when we have avenue to communicate facially with someone, we are most likely to convey our thoughts better. This is because there is a level of emotion that our talks portray when we speak orally. My personal experience is a compelling example to illustrate this point. Three years ago, I worked as a construction manager with a civil engineering company in Lagos. Due to my fidelity and timely delivery of mini projects, I was transferred to supervise a road construction contract in a certain village. Having successfully completed my responsibilities, it was a norm that the company promote my into higher position. However, my promotion was not effected even after writing several letters to the company's management. I would send a mail to the managing director to express my thoughts and need for my promotion, all to no avail. So, I deemed it fit to travel down to the head office and speak with the company's management. Getting to the director's office, the man had already noticed a matter of urgency even before I began to speak. After a short discussion with the director, he ordered that my letter of promotion drafted and approved. Had I not gotten a chance to approach the director's facially, I would have kept on sending mails and letters without any positive result.
Furthermore, facial communication can be more effective than letters and emails when we are indisposed. For our doctors or medical practitioners to better understand the nature of our sickness, they may need us to communicate with them facially. For instance, two months ago, I had a subtle feeling of headache after returning from work. I thought to myself that I needed to threat malaria. So, I sent a text message to my doctor. Unfortunately, the headache became more severe than I expected. Hence, I managed to drive to the hospital and speak with my medical personnel. Through our conversation, he noticed something unusual in my eyeballs and looked more intently. Eventually, the doctor deciphered that I was having a typhoid fever. He admitted me for a few days, and gave me medical cares until I completely recuperate. This example clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of communicating facially.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that conveying information face to face is better than writing of letters. This is because facial communication allows effective expression of thoughts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 958, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'directors'' or 'director's'?
Suggestion: directors'; director's
...the companys management. Getting to the directors office, the man had already noticed a m...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, look, may, so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04156784646 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554824561404 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9857294109 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.7857142857 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136791902737 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356000694769 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044392487089 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10032431069 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540867156001 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.