Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
--Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
--Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Everyone might make some mistakes during their presentations. Sometimes listeners are hard to interrupt them and telling them the mistake they made. They might choose to wait until the meeting is over, or even say nothing about the mistake. As far as effectiveness and equality are concerned, I strongly hold that listeners should tell the leader or teacher about the mistake right away.
First of all, interrupt and correct the mistake right away could make all of the listeners have the right concepts. The goal of the classes and meetings is to convey accurate knowledge to the listeners. If there is some wrong information about it, the courses might be not efficient. My experience is the best illustration of this. Five years ago, I had participated in a project when I was in college. Every week, we had to presentate our work to teacher and other group members. In a meetings, my partner, John told the wrong result of experiment and he didn't recongnized it. I interrupted him quickly and remind him about the mistake he made. He corrected his result and apologized to everyone. After the meeting, he came to me and telling me that he was so thankful that I had immediately disrupted him in the meeting. If I didn't tell him the mistake right away, this meeting might be time wasting. Moreover, the conclusion of the whole research might be wrong and we should do the experiments again.
Second, everyone in the course has the right to know about the right information. If I didn't correct the mistake right away. Then other people might not know about the truth anymore. In the class, the professor tells something incorrect. If I choose to tell the professor after class, all of the students are already went home. Those students might not have a chance realize the correct concept, because professor might forget to correct his mistake in the future. These mistake might influence the people's life at worse. In this case, I think that correct the mistake right away could let all people know about the accurate knowledge and prevent other mistakes in future.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that listeners have the responsibility to correct the teacher or leader mistake right away. It can not only make the presentation more efficient, but also all of the people in the course or meeting have a right to know the truth which could prevent more errors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rrect the mistake right away could make all of the listeners have the right concepts. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a meeting' or simply 'meetings'?
Suggestion: a meeting; meetings
... to teacher and other group members. In a meetings, my partner, John told the wrong result...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...d the wrong result of experiment and he didnt recongnized it. I interrupted him quick...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...tely disrupted him in the meeting. If I didnt tell him the mistake right away, this m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ht to know about the right information. If I didnt correct the mistake right away....
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... know about the right information. If I didnt correct the mistake right away. Then ot...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...oose to tell the professor after class, all of the students are already went home. Those s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ture. These mistake might influence the peoples life at worse. In this case, I think th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...te knowledge and prevent other mistakes in future. In conclusion, I strongly believe t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e presentation more efficient, but also all of the people in the course or meeting have a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85221674877 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61037731795 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453201970443 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8238562916 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7692307692 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271181581359 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790619322202 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698523811531 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178639107057 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263983593934 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.