Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Sometimes speakers make mistakes accidentally while speaking and it could be happened anywhere in a meeting or a classroom. In my opinion, I think it is better to interrupt and correct the mistake right away. In the following essay I intend to put forth my arguments to support my view.
To begin with, correcting the mistake right away helps to understand the topic more clearly. Sometimes when a teacher makes mistake during lecture it may disturb the concept about the topic. Also, students may lose interest in the class because the information get mix up with one wrong statement. Therefore, it is better for a person to make correction right away. My own experience is a compelling example of this. In the physical chemistry class our teacher were discussing the concept active and passive diffusion. She mistakenly mixed the basic concept of active diffusion with passive diffusion by reciprocating their definition. When she further explained about the experiment she got stuck, because it was not the result that she was describing. One of the classfellow then corrected her that, active process require energy and passive diffusion doesnot need energy. For this reason, the class was able to conclude the result of experimently correctly, This example elucidates that it is very advantageous to interrupt and correct the wrong doing right away.
In addition, correcting the lecturer right away helps them to be vigiliant and focused while they prepare for the lecture. Professor or a leader knows that audience rely on them and they listen carefully, so they will take extra measures to keep the topic clear and make no mistake. For instance, when one time our class fellow corrected the mistake of the chemistry teacher. After that she was extra focused and never made the mistake. Moreover, she always try to keep the topic coherent and concise so the students do not face problem in understanding.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that whenever the lecturer says something wrong the best thing to do is to interrupt and correct them immediately. This is because, it keeps the interest of the listener in the lecture, and because it helps to understand the topic clearly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y prepare for the lecture. Professor or a leader knows that audience rely on the...
^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
... made the mistake. Moreover, she always try to keep the topic coherent and concise ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08033240997 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73593074198 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509695290859 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0236279049 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223495619059 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662410726928 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666051773082 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139144078428 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443556953492 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.