When employees feel that the management of their company is doing something wrong, what do you think is the best way for them to respond? Talking to the media, Speaking to the management directly, Discussing the problem with each other
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important for the companies to behave ethically and responsibly to keep good environment in the office. In my opinion, I prefer to discuss the problem with other people. I feel this way for the following reasons which I will explore in the subsequent essay.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that, management are the support for company which keeps the discipline in it. If somewhere management does wrong in the office, discussion among the employee could solve this problem. The emloyee when work together have the power to change the management. Their rights and work ethics always comes first. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Few years ago, my company leaders were not providing us with bonuses. I found that very irresponsible and shared this point to my colleagues. They united among this unethical behaviour and the complaint reached to head of our company. Thus, the leaders quickly paid cheques to the employees and apologize for their attitude. Thus, this example elucidates that talking with each other is the best way to solve the problems about company leaders.
In addition, talking to media about any problem in a company will likely to exagerrate the situation. In todays modern world most of the media wants to sell any type of news, as they only care about money. If the news spread in the media it would create bad reputation of the company. For this many employee will lose their jobs right away. Moreover, the news channel mostly funded by huge companies , so it is unlikely that they would take any action against it. Additionally, if employee speaks directly to the mangement, they will not do anything. This is because they moslty have control in the office. Therefore, the best choice is that employee talk to each other and take some action against it by protesting or by circulating the news among other people about the leaders.
In conclusion, I prefer that discussing the problem among each other is the best possible way to deal with the wrong doing of the management. This is because, employees have the power to change the decision of a management, and because talking to media and to the could create dilemma to the problem rather than solving the situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of news, as they only care about money. If the news spread in the media it would c...
^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun employee seems to be countable; consider using: 'many employees'.
Suggestion: many employees
...bad reputation of the company. For this many employee will lose their jobs right away. Moreov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... channel mostly funded by huge companies , so it is unlikely that they would take ...
^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll not do anything. This is because they moslty have control in the office. There...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90813648294 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57574596126 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496062992126 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7383328959 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3043478261 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5652173913 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95652173913 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313774387357 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847089201418 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738979447249 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196245204795 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288478874968 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.