Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers are one of the most important parts of our society and in our religion people should show respect. Some people are inclined toward the attitude that if a person makes any mistake, they do not deserve respect, whereas others hold different perspectives. I personally, though, believe that if teachers had made any mistake in the classroom students do not have the right to correct them with disrespectfulness. In the following essay, I intend to put forth my points and reasons for support.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that all teachers are human beings. It is not a big deal if she says something wrong. As the responsibility of students is that they should wait for a meeting to be over. This is the right way to correct your teacher. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. To exemplify, when I was in school my science explained the hydrologic cycle concept and she replaces the first point with the second. I was the one who knew that because I already read this topic before. When the lecture ended I went to the staff room and told my professor about her mistake. The next day she came to class and correct the whole class by mentioning a sorry. Therefore, this experience taught me that always respect your teacher.
Secondly, in our religion teachers have gotten the highest position after parents. If you can not give importance or respect to teachers, you are not a good child for your parents. It is the duty of students although the teacher is wrong and everyone knows just wait for the right time to correct her. For instance, when years back my cousin told me her teacher did not allow her to sit in exams because of another student. Later after class, I told the professor the real story about what happened. As a result, he says my bad I did not look properly into the matter next time I will be careful. Therefore, this example illustrates that if you want to make God happy never try to make the teacher fall from the specific level.
In light of the reasons mentioned, I strongly believe that never interrupt and correct the mistake right away in front of the whole class wait for a good time to correct it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 740, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...d correct the whole class by mentioning a sorry. Therefore, this experience taught me t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ook properly into the matter next time I will be careful. Therefore, this example...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59296482412 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5357174295 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522613065327 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0831971533 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227023535082 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622309471822 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058701746636 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137983148391 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323601218037 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.